Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 22, 2017 18:30:11 GMT
I think some of you in this thread are missing the real issue here. The NHS has become so politicised and as a result so subject to such figures as this CE being scrutinised including how they respond to matters pertaining to equality and diversity that to do something not deemed acceptable by her board could cost her job. So if you want to blame anything blame the direction this country (And along with it the public sector) is taking on such matters. It's not of her making I would suggest though of course she makes a convieient scapegoat for those easily taken in by tabloidesque reporting. And for the record I always looked fabulous in my nurses uniform. Or maybe she needs to grow some fuckin balls ( I know that's a near impossible ask in the public sector) and do what's right for the people she's paid to be serving! These talentless twats in their ' cushy job for life' need to try a month or two in the private sector ! You are just showing again that you don't understand the point I was making. Yes she could 'grow some balls' (well actually she couldnt but I get what you mean' but she has I reckon been strongly advised against accepting such a donation because of a potential backlash from certain board members and probably staff members too. Lots of people would see the funny side but those that haven't would sure try to make her pay the price ie her job. If you want to grasp what I am saying try to step away from the rather poor reporting you have linked to and think about how others in senior positions or celebs are constantly having to apologise for or retract something they have said because it's not PC. it's rife.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Aug 22, 2017 18:37:10 GMT
Just for the record, if anyone wants to raise £2,500 and give it to me, then I don't give a fuck if they wear a "I love Harold Shipman" T shirt while they are waving the bucket around.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 22, 2017 18:41:59 GMT
MJG is entirely correct.
The person's job is obviously much more important than providing an additional ECG machine for patients waiting.
How insensitive of us all.
Rog
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 22, 2017 18:43:51 GMT
Or maybe she needs to grow some fuckin balls ( I know that's a near impossible ask in the public sector) and do what's right for the people she's paid to be serving! These talentless twats in their ' cushy job for life' need to try a month or two in the private sector ! You are just showing again that you don't understand the point I was making. Yes she could 'grow some balls' (well actually she couldnt but I get what you mean' but she has I reckon been strongly advised against accepting such a donation because of a potential backlash from certain board members and probably staff members too. Lots of people would see the funny side but those that haven't would sure try to make her pay the price ie her job. If you want to grasp what I am saying try to step away from the rather poor reporting you have linked to and think about how others in senior positions or celebs are constantly having to apologise for or retract something they have said because it's not PC. it's rife. How many nurses would donate the money to the hospital if offered £20 from the fund and told it is theirs to do what they pleased with, but we would prefer you to donate it to the hospital. I don't know, but suspect many would. Would the gesture change anything at the top...
|
|
|
Post by Andyberg on Aug 22, 2017 18:44:13 GMT
Or maybe she needs to grow some fuckin balls ( I know that's a near impossible ask in the public sector) and do what's right for the people she's paid to be serving! These talentless twats in their ' cushy job for life' need to try a month or two in the private sector ! You are just showing again that you don't understand the point I was making. Yes she could 'grow some balls' (well actually she couldnt but I get what you mean' but she has I reckon been strongly advised against accepting such a donation because of a potential backlash from certain board members and probably staff members too. Lots of people would see the funny side but those that haven't would sure try to make her pay the price ie her job. If you want to grasp what I am saying try to step away from the rather poor reporting you have linked to and think about how others in senior positions or celebs are constantly having to apologise for or retract something they have said because it's not PC. it's rife. I know exactly what you're saying and perhaps 'she' growing balls isn't what I actually meant, it's the whole public sector from board level down that need to grasp that they are paid to serve the public. if said board members think they have the right to prevent the public receiving treatments they are entitled to ( as in the ECG monitor paid for by these fellas donations), because' they 'feel ' uncomfortable' about it then perhaps they are in the wrong job and should be brought to task!
|
|
|
Post by Clinton Cool on Aug 22, 2017 18:55:30 GMT
I'm fine with the general concept of this, provided Shropshire health trust ban their female nurses from wearing trousers at work and adopt a "skirt-only" policy. If it is unacceptable for men to dress as women, then surely it is just as unacceptable for women to dress as men? After all, that is the whole point of equality. Well no, not really. The point of equality is to remove perceived priviliges from one group of people whilst maintaining priviliges for the other group. We can see this by the fact that we have a minister for women, tasked with, amongst other things, tackling the issue that women tend to prefer to take lower paid jobs than men. There's no minister for men, despite the fact that they live shorter lives and despite this, are offered less preventative healthcare in the form of scans etc.
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Aug 22, 2017 18:56:04 GMT
£2500 is Tony Blair's hourly wage at his speeches.
|
|
|
Post by Andyberg on Aug 22, 2017 19:00:12 GMT
£2500 is Tony Blair's hourly wage at his speeches. And ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 22, 2017 19:11:33 GMT
MJG is entirely correct. The person's job is obviously much more important than providing an additional ECG machine for patients waiting. How insensitive of us all. Rog A complete misreprenration of what I actually said.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 22, 2017 19:15:58 GMT
£2500 is Tony Blair's hourly wage at his speeches. Will you fuck off randomly posting your psychotic shit on every thread. Idiot.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 22, 2017 19:17:00 GMT
You are just showing again that you don't understand the point I was making. Yes she could 'grow some balls' (well actually she couldnt but I get what you mean' but she has I reckon been strongly advised against accepting such a donation because of a potential backlash from certain board members and probably staff members too. Lots of people would see the funny side but those that haven't would sure try to make her pay the price ie her job. If you want to grasp what I am saying try to step away from the rather poor reporting you have linked to and think about how others in senior positions or celebs are constantly having to apologise for or retract something they have said because it's not PC. it's rife. I know exactly what you're saying and perhaps 'she' growing balls isn't what I actually meant, it's the whole public sector from board level down that need to grasp that they are paid to serve the public. if said board members think they have the right to prevent the public receiving treatments they are entitled to ( as in the ECG monitor paid for by these fellas donations), because' they 'feel ' uncomfortable' about it then perhaps they are in the wrong job and should be brought to task! Spot on.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Aug 22, 2017 19:17:15 GMT
MJG is entirely correct. The person's job is obviously much more important than providing an additional ECG machine for patients waiting. How insensitive of us all. Rog A complete misreprenration of what I actually said. Not really. Dogless just condensed all of your pretentious waffle into one short sentence which said exactly the same thing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 22, 2017 19:17:45 GMT
You are just showing again that you don't understand the point I was making. Yes she could 'grow some balls' (well actually she couldnt but I get what you mean' but she has I reckon been strongly advised against accepting such a donation because of a potential backlash from certain board members and probably staff members too. Lots of people would see the funny side but those that haven't would sure try to make her pay the price ie her job. If you want to grasp what I am saying try to step away from the rather poor reporting you have linked to and think about how others in senior positions or celebs are constantly having to apologise for or retract something they have said because it's not PC. it's rife. I know exactly what you're saying and perhaps 'she' growing balls isn't what I actually meant, it's the whole public sector from board level down that need to grasp that they are paid to serve the public. if said board members think they have the right to prevent the public receiving treatments they are entitled to ( as in the ECG monitor paid for by these fellas donations), because' they 'feel ' uncomfortable' about it then perhaps they are in the wrong job and should be brought to task! In essence we are agreeing. I just think some on here are aiming their arrows at the wrong target. As the culture in this country stands she is more likely to be brought to task for accepting it rather than not, that is where we are. It's not actually a situation of her making but she has to work within it if she wants to keep her job. The media could spin it just as quickly the other way if she'd accepted it. They do it all the time.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 22, 2017 19:18:55 GMT
A complete misreprenration of what I actually said. Not really. Dogless just condensed all of your pretentious waffle into one short sentence which said exactly the same thing. No he completely misrepresented what I said.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 22, 2017 19:19:54 GMT
MJG is entirely correct. The person's job is obviously much more important than providing an additional ECG machine for patients waiting. How insensitive of us all. Rog A complete misreprenration of what I actually said. Perhaps you should start looking at what your writing. Constantly suggesting everybody else on this forum misses your point suggests your not much good at getting your point across. The odds are, your wrong, and the many are right.
|
|