Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 8, 2017 15:31:15 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Sept 8, 2017 16:10:35 GMT
Yes, Maggers, I saw that too this morning and almost put it up here because of the Newcastle/Tyne photos that have been posted. But I thought it even below my low standards. As for The Daily Mail, why do people keep laughing at it? It's the same news as in The Times and Telegraph ('tabloids' themselves these days), The Sun, The Evening Standard, The Not-So-Independent, and all the rest. It's the same News in all papers and all TV channels. Yes, The Daily Mail's writers/'journalists' are thick as porridge, but they get what you want to read across, don't they? One of the best features about the Dimwits' Mail is the readers' comments (when allowed to comment), some of them are witty. I've never bought The Daily Mail in my life, but I do look at it on-line, it is entertaining to an extent. Talking of 'News': 1. Why has it gone all quiet about Lightship Planet? Did the Gang-of-Four get served with their marching orders to Court? 2. What exactly was it wrong with ricco's engine? And why? And what's happening about it? edit to give you this evening's Finland's "Daily Mail": www.iltalehti.fi/ |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 8, 2017 16:17:03 GMT
Just to be clear.
I HATE ALL NEWSPAPERS AND EVERYTHING ELSE.
i'll now deal with your comments -
Its a fairly quiet forum. There are only a few people who post excessively. Why this is is anyone's guess.
I'm intrigued by the lightship planet as well. Did the buyer actually do the signature thing and get the boat. Was it a scam all along or some sort of publicity stunt. Nobody knows. Maybe it was all made up by delta9.
As for ricco's engine as I said before I reckon the fekkin fekker is fekkin fekked (edited for language!)
Typo edit
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 8, 2017 16:38:23 GMT
I hate the DM as it's a right biased paper that also uses sensationalism and made up 'facts' to push it's agenda. Ok all media does that but the DM does it very well. Link here mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-mail/ if you want to check my views match others. Private Eye gets a thumbs up from me. |
|
|
|
Post by thebfg on Sept 8, 2017 16:55:46 GMT
Yes, Maggers, I saw that too this morning and almost put it up here because of the Newcastle/Tyne photos that have been posted. But I thought it even below my low standards. As for The Daily Mail, why do people keep laughing at it? It's the same news as in The Times and Telegraph ('tabloids' themselves these days), The Sun, The Evening Standard, The Not-So-Independent, and all the rest. It's the same News in all papers and all TV channels. Yes, The Daily Mail's writers/'journalists' are thick as porridge, but they get what you want to read across, don't they? One of the best features about the Dimwits' Mail is the readers' comments (when allowed to comment), some of them are witty. I've never bought The Daily Mail in my life, but I do look at it on-line, it is entertaining to an extent. Talking of 'News': 1. Why has it gone all quiet about Lightship Planet? Did the Gang-of-Four get served with their marching orders to Court? 2. What exactly was it wrong with ricco's engine? And why? And what's happening about it? edit to give you this evening's Finland's "Daily Mail": www.iltalehti.fi/it may be the same headlines but the detail in the article is often very different. on a different note. I will bet that in the next 16 weeks the front page of the dm will feature a headline around we are all going to die in the worst winter for years. because they don't do sensational headlines at all.😉 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 8, 2017 17:12:09 GMT
I wonder if they'll do a nuclear war thing as well? A return to the 60s perhaps.
|
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Sept 8, 2017 17:20:47 GMT
and made up 'facts' to push it's agenda. just like the European Union. |
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Sept 8, 2017 17:31:06 GMT
I just watched this and thought it very well made. For those who haven't followed Guardians of the Galaxy 1 and 2 you probably won't understand much. I watched both and like them very much even thought this kind of 'fantasy' isn't usually my kind of thing. The computer effects are astounding. The humour, although American, comes in quite close to the British sense of humour:
|
|
