Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2019 9:11:43 GMT
It's a photo hosting site. He uses another name on it. If andrew is denying it then you need to post a link and prove it. No I do not. I'm happy with my knowledge. I'm not remotely interested in satisfying yours. Do your own searches!
|
|
|
Post by bargemast on Apr 14, 2019 9:15:49 GMT
Talking of photos, I shall be doing a touch of boating at Easter, and will try to take photos that may appeal to Thunderboaters. As your photos are always very good, I'm sure that they'll appeal to me, and I wish you happy Easter boating. Peter.
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Apr 14, 2019 9:33:24 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2019 9:50:16 GMT
It's a photo hosting site. He uses another name on it. If andrew is denying it then you need to post a link and prove it.Β Ah. It may be a reference to a photobucket account but I haven't used that since they started taking money a few years ago. For images on here I use UPL.CO as you don't need an account and its simple to use.
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Apr 14, 2019 10:24:41 GMT
If andrew is denying it then you need to post a link and prove it.Β Ah. It may be a reference to a photobucket account but I haven't used that since they started taking money a few years ago. For images on here I use UPL.CO as you don't need an account and its simple to use. Thanks for the clarification, good to know there are some helpful people around.
|
|
|
Post by bargemast on Apr 14, 2019 11:07:34 GMT
If andrew is denying it then you need to post a link and prove it. Ah. It may be a reference to a photobucket account but I haven't used that since they started taking money a few years ago. For images on here I use UPL.CO as you don't need an account and its simple to use. Thanks for listing this again, I was looking for it as I remembered you wrote about it before, but I couldn't find it. This time I've made a note of it as it seems a usuful- and easy hosting site. Peter.
|
|
|
Post by patty on Apr 14, 2019 11:11:13 GMT
Talking of photos, I shall be doing a touch of boating at Easter, and will try to take photos that may appeal to Thunderboaters. I'm hopefully boating in May..rest assured if I do everyone will know and I'll be taking lots of pics...plan is Scotland and the Clyde.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2019 11:30:02 GMT
Ah. It may be a reference to a photobucket account but I haven't used that since they started taking money a few years ago. For images on here I use UPL.CO as you don't need an account and its simple to use. Thanks for the clarification, good to know there are some helpful people around. Twat.
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Apr 14, 2019 11:36:21 GMT
Thanks for the clarification, good to know there are some helpful people around. Twat. ππππππ
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2019 11:50:03 GMT
Anyway I had a word with the ladies at the MI5 HQ in Besançon yesterday and apparently this geyser is not in fact a gas fitter he is an FSB agent.
|
|
|
Post by TonyDunkley on Apr 14, 2019 13:02:28 GMT
The real question here then, simply boils down to whether the licence was legitimately revoked or not. Everything I have seen so far, suggests not. I would say absolutely NOT, and remain convinced that this is simply part of a test of how successful their T&C's con trick has been since the new T&C's were introduced by C&RT, whose hope was that boat owners/keepers would be gullible enough to believe 'override' statute, . . and somewhat oddly, insist on being 'voluntarily' agreed to in every PBL or PBC application. Clause 8.3 purports in effect to give them the power to instantly terminate any form of 'relevant consent' on arbitrarily declaring some supposedly unfixable transgression in respect of some other aspect of their 'wish list' T&C's.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2019 13:18:15 GMT
It does seem an interesting residential model to pursue. Quite a decent square footage of accomodation space. Certainly a nicer environment than a shithouse £££ per week private rental. No need to get a mooring because mooring providers will refuse you and you can still shuffle it up and down a length of canal in order to "satisfy the board" on a <β¬1000 a year "relevant consent".
What's not to like?
If it proves to be a viable option then perhaps make another one and rent it out? Then another one. And another then maybe lower costs and go into series production.
Sales patter: "Sail away to a dream life living in a ditch full of weed. Maaan."
|
|
|
Post by kris on Apr 14, 2019 13:26:55 GMT
And we are still none-the-wiser as to what all this is about. Anything new on the NBTA site, or on the London Boaters' Facebook page? I rather think that a clearer picture has been emerging, and that the NBTA responses to you, as well as Tony's contributions, have been informative. The vessel has evidently attracted attention in previous years, culminating in an alleged court order dated 6 October 2017, following which the vessel was re-licensed, albeit under a different ID. In August the following year, CaRT decided to revoke the licence and serve further s.8 etc notices, for alleged breach of conditions, and the owner was told during ensuing discussions that he would need to obtain a home mooring if the licence was to be restored. Perhaps in order to give him time to organise this, they granted a winter mooring from November 2018 expiring March this year. It becoming apparent that no marina wished to take that vessel once seeing the photographs of it, and re-iterating that CaRT were not satisfied that it could fulfill continuous cruising requirements, he has been told, upon expiry of the winter mooring permit, that he must remove the vessel or have it removed and destroyed at his expense. The tension has escalated to the point where CaRT say now that even if he does obtain a mooring, and they are compelled under the 1995 Act to issue a licence, they will immediately revoke it, on the grounds that he will not be compliant with T&C no 7.3 i.e. that the vessel is not suitable for navigating the relevant stretch of waterway. A very clear statement that their T&C's effectively over-ride the statute, by 'virtue' of the ostensible contractual agreement that they can do so for the reasons given, however compliant with law the vessel may be otherwise. The alleged T&C breaches they had previously identified as: 1) not having a BSSC; 2) not complying with relevant legislation, byelaws, and the navigation rules identified in Schedule 5, and/or not following CaRT's β lawful directions, spoken or written (including signs)β - powers denied in the 1990 Bill proceedings; and 3) not being fit for navigation on the waterway where it is intended to be used. The latest communication from them has reduced the complaints to the last one, should he obtain a home mooring and confirm his BSSC and insurance. One can only presume that their conviction that the vessel is/was a danger to himself and others rested solely on their otherwise unsubstantiated claim that the BSSC was obtained under false pretences. Thanks very much for this post Nigel, I think it explains the situation very clearly and fairly.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Apr 14, 2019 13:34:26 GMT
I didn't make it clear enough for everybody to understand, but I was talking about the tears of the people that were reading my postings, and their tears (of compassion) ruining their keyboards, for which I don't want to get blamed for. Peter. Oh I thought it was you doing the weeping. Classic misunderstanding Well your enough to make anybody weep. As for what Peter was saying he's talking about your lack of empathy, you can tell me to mind my own business but didn't you say once that you have a condition that means for not very empathic?
|
|
|
Post by kris on Apr 14, 2019 13:36:18 GMT
bargemast if you have trouble with your tears damaging the keyboard have you tried a touchscreen? That's what I do as you can just wipe the liquid off. I didn't make it clear enough for everybody to understand, but I was talking about the tears of the people that were reading my postings, and their tears (of compassion) ruining their keyboards, for which I don't want to get blamed for. Peter. Sorry to hear its not going so well for you at the moment Peter. Don't be worried about sharing your troubles, sometimes talking can help.
|
|