|
Post by dogless on Apr 24, 2024 11:43:58 GMT
Apropos of your mention, I had a piece of sticky toffee pudding cheesecake in a coffee bar ... fabulous
Rog
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Apr 24, 2024 14:45:38 GMT
See posts :- thunderboat.boards.net/post/396344/thread -and- thunderboat.boards.net/post/396531/threadIt's remarkable but unsurprising how, amid the small number of internet trolls that blight this forum, the ability to read and understand plain written English appears to be an inversely proportional function of the frequency, rapidity of reponse, and seriousness of the specifically targeted on-line stalking activities that accompany, and result from, the constant close monitoring of any and all the content I post on the Thunderboat forum. __________________________________________ Extracts from :- thunderboat.boards.net/post/396344/thread :- 5.The Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (see Annex B) includes the following non-exhaustive list of examples of ‘acts or omissions associated with stalking’: ___________________________________________________ c) publishing any statement or other material - relating or purporting to relate to a person, or purporting to originate from a person, d) monitoring the use by a person of the internet, email or any other form of electronic communication, __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1997/40/contentsIf forum members [posting as] dogless, dyertribe, and Jim wish to avoid prosecution under the provisions of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, they must refrain from adding to their existing Police file record (saved screenshots) of past offences, and cease committing any further offences of the same nature. I have no objection, for the present, if in future they cease the wilful targeted trollng of topics/threads I have initiated, and confine posted content resulting from their constant close monitoring of the content I post on this internet forum to the vast selection of pointless claptrap laden topics/threads from which they, . . and the other on-line trolls who have hi-jacked and treat this forum as if it were theirs to administer and run as their own, . . appear to gain so much mindless satisfaction.
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Apr 24, 2024 16:27:08 GMT
Do you prefer STP with lashings of cream, dollops of ice-cream or gallons of thick custard. Maybe all 3?
|
|
|
Post by on Apr 24, 2024 16:37:08 GMT
I zzzlike whishkeeeee mhaaath maaan
|
|
|
Post by on Apr 24, 2024 16:38:17 GMT
Have to go out in a small launch later and try not to fall in!
Unsure whether it should be the HSL or the stealth launch in this scenario.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Apr 24, 2024 17:44:21 GMT
See posts :- thunderboat.boards.net/post/396344/thread -and- thunderboat.boards.net/post/396531/threadIt's remarkable but unsurprising how, amid the small number of internet trolls that blight this forum, the ability to read and understand plain written English appears to be an inversely proportional function of the frequency, rapidity of reponse, and seriousness of the specifically targeted on-line stalking activities that accompany, and result from, the constant close monitoring of any and all the content I post on the Thunderboat forum. __________________________________________ Extracts from :- thunderboat.boards.net/post/396344/thread :- 5.The Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (see Annex B) includes the following non-exhaustive list of examples of ‘acts or omissions associated with stalking’: ___________________________________________________ c) publishing any statement or other material - relating or purporting to relate to a person, or purporting to originate from a person, d) monitoring the use by a person of the internet, email or any other form of electronic communication, ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1997/40/contentsIf forum members [posting as] dogless, dyertribe, Jim and 'no name' wish to avoid prosecution under the provisions of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, they must refrain from adding to their existing Police file record (saved screenshots) of past offences, and cease committing any further offences of the same nature. I have no objection, for the present, if in future they cease the wilful targeted trollng of topics/threads I have initiated, and confine posted content resulting from their constant close monitoring of the content I post on this internet forum to the vast selection of pointless claptrap laden topics/threads from which they, . . and the other on-line trolls who have hi-jacked and treat this forum as if it were theirs to administer and run as their own, . . appear to gain so much mindless satisfaction. Re-posted to add the member foolishly attempting to remain anonymous by posting as 'no name'.
|
|
|
Post by dyertribe on Apr 24, 2024 21:48:56 GMT
Do you prefer STP with lashings of cream, dollops of ice-cream or gallons of thick custard. Maybe all 3? Cream
|
|
|
Post by Trina on Apr 24, 2024 22:01:17 GMT
I'd go for some sort of home made mousse-the dead simple kind using jelly,fruit & condensed milk.They always turn out yummy.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Apr 25, 2024 0:56:12 GMT
See posts :- thunderboat.boards.net/post/396344/thread -and- thunderboat.boards.net/post/396531/threadIt's remarkable but unsurprising how, amid the small number of internet trolls that blight this forum, the ability to read and understand plain written English appears to be an inversely proportional function of the frequency, rapidity of reponse, and seriousness of the specifically targeted on-line stalking activities that accompany, and result from, the constant close monitoring of any and all the content I post on the Thunderboat forum. __________________________________________ Extracts from :- thunderboat.boards.net/post/396344/thread :- 5.The Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (see Annex B) includes the following non-exhaustive list of examples of ‘acts or omissions associated with stalking’: ___________________________________________________ c) publishing any statement or other material - relating or purporting to relate to a person, or purporting to originate from a person, d) monitoring the use by a person of the internet, email or any other form of electronic communication, ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1997/40/contentsIf forum members [posting as] dogless, dyertribe, Jim and 'no name' wish to avoid prosecution under the provisions of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, they must refrain from adding to their existing Police file record (saved screenshots) of past offences, and cease committing any further offences of the same nature. I have no objection, for the present, if in future they cease the wilful targeted trollng of topics/threads I have initiated, and confine posted content resulting from their constant close monitoring of the content I post on this internet forum to the vast selection of pointless claptrap laden topics/threads from which they, . . and the other on-line trolls who have hi-jacked and treat this forum as if it were theirs to administer and run as their own, . . appear to gain so much mindless satisfaction. Re-posted to add the member foolishly attempting to remain anonymous by posting as 'no name'.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Apr 25, 2024 4:28:45 GMT
Anyone remember this ? It's a letter from a law firm acting for C&RT, . . and it was sent with the express purpose and in the hope of deterring me from publishing details of how C&RT's lawyers intentionally mislead the Courts, . . of their preparedness to exhibit false evidence at hearing, . . and of their preparedness to instigate or facilitate the falsification of Court papers and documentation : --
Mr A.K.Dunkley 11 January 2021
Dear Sir
Our client: Canal & River Trust
We are instructed by Canal & River Trust ("the Trust") which is, as you are aware, a charity and statutory authority with responsibility for over 2000 miles of inland canals and waterways in England and Wales and takes reputational issues very seriously.
It has come to their attention that the Website Thunderboat, operated through ProBoards contains a chat thread -- General Boating Cart the only charity that works to make people homeless -- (https://thunderboat.boards.net/thread/6872/cart-charity-works-people-homeless?page=22) - =- which contains a wide variety of comments posted by you which are untrue and misleading and are defamatory of the Trust and members of their staff.
Our client wrote to you on 1 December to express their concerns, in particular regarding posts on 18 November 2020 at 12.43am and 25 November 2020 at 8.04am.
The posts contained allegations regarding the Trust and a member of their legal team (who had previously been identified by name in earlier posts, Lucy Barry) suggesting that "doctored" evidence had been provided to the court and that the Trust paid bribes to opponents. These allegations are utterly without foundation and categorically untrue.
The posts are likely to cause serious harm to the reputation of Miss Barry and the Trust, and are intended to do so. They are defamatory of them and constitute malicious falsehood.
Subsequent postings by you during the months of November and December 2020 regarding the Trust and their personnel repeat references to "doctored" evidence, fraud, individuals retained by the Trust "posing" as bailiffs or being bogus etc. Again these claims are false and utterly without foundation and are defamatory and constitute malicious falsehood.
The Trust accept that it is legitimate for customers to express their views online in relation to genuine boating matters or customer service issues, and that there may be vigorous differences of opinion over matters of policy.
What is not acceptable is to publish unsubstantiated allegations attacking individuals for no good reason as part of what appears to be a settling of scores.
Despite the Trust writing to you on 1 December setting out their concerns you have not removed the posts and indeed have made further posts with similar content and indeed posted the content of the letter of 1 December.
We take the view that is conduct is abusive and violates the ProBoards Terms of Service and in particular clauses 18 and 19 in that the posts amount to objectionable content which is defamatory, abusive and threatening and is also false and misleading. Accordingly we have been in touch with ProBoards who have reviewed the content in question and removed the offending posts.
The purpose of this letter is to advise you that our client will continue to monitor your activity on social media and in the event that further similar material is published by you they will not hesitate to take further action and this may include commencing legal proceedings against you. They reserve the right to refer to this correspondence should this prove necessary.
Yours faithfully Blake Morgan LLPWell, . . who does remember that letter, and all the empty threats in it, . . or why C&RT thought better of instructing Blake Morgan to pursue the matter any further ?
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Apr 25, 2024 4:29:44 GMT
Has anyone ever tried boiling the can of condensed milk till it turns into toffee? But sweet for my taste though.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Apr 25, 2024 5:05:46 GMT
|
|
|
Post by dyertribe on Apr 25, 2024 6:18:53 GMT
Has anyone ever tried boiling the can of condensed milk till it turns into toffee? But sweet for my taste though. No, mainly due to safety reasons. You can buy it ready done now. Much less chance of things going wrong.
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Apr 25, 2024 6:21:46 GMT
Not a problem so long as you don't let the pan boil dry.
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Apr 25, 2024 7:16:56 GMT
Has anyone ever tried boiling the can of condensed milk till it turns into toffee? But sweet for my taste though. No, mainly due to safety reasons. You can buy it ready done now. Much less chance of things going wrong. I understand the risk but in my early years, tinned baked beans were always heated by boiling the can, we never had an explosion. I suppose it saved a bit of washing up.
|
|