|
Post by Mr Stabby on May 31, 2023 19:24:50 GMT
I'll email Lucy Barry later at the email address which Tony Dunkley has so kindly provided, point her in the direction of some of his recent posts and request that she contacts ProBoards and get them to toast his account again and threaten Delta9 with legal action if he allows him back using a new account.______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ So, . . what was the outcome of that great meeting of minds, eh, . . Shit-for-Brains ? As I said elsewhere, I will be sending the email on Friday,.. Convicted Thief and Child Sex Offender Tony Dunkley.
|
|
|
Post by fi on May 31, 2023 19:27:30 GMT
I'll email Lucy Barry later at the email address which Tony Dunkley has so kindly provided, point her in the direction of some of his recent posts and request that she contacts ProBoards and get them to toast his account again and threaten Delta9 with legal action if he allows him back using a new account.______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ So, . . what was the outcome of that great meeting of minds, eh, . . Shit-for-Brains ? As I said elsewhere, I will be sending the email on Friday,.. Convicted Thief and Child Sex Offender Tony Dunkley.More bullshit.
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on May 31, 2023 19:34:10 GMT
As I said elsewhere, I will be sending the email on Friday,.. Convicted Thief and Child Sex Offender Tony Dunkley.More bullshit. There's a lot of it about.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on May 31, 2023 19:44:16 GMT
There's a lot of it about. A bit like boat scam victim Naughtyfox telling me I was a liar when I said that I'd been to the Gambia, followed by me posting a photo of the Gambian entry and exit stamps in my passport, or telling me I was a liar when I said I had been refunded by Midland Chandlers for the defective batteries I bought followed by me posting a photo of the debit card refund printout then. A liar never believes a word anyone else says.
|
|
|
Post by fi on May 31, 2023 19:48:30 GMT
There's a lot of it about. A bit like boat scam victim Naughtyfox telling me I was a liar when I said that I'd been to the Gambia, followed by me posting a photo of the Gambian entry and exit stamps in my passport, or telling me I was a liar when I said I had been refunded by Midland Chandlers for the defective batteries I bought followed by me posting a photo of the debit card refund printout then. A liar never believes a word anyone else says. So......................
Prove to the forum that Tony D is a convicted Child sex offender. Or shut the fuck up with your bullshit.
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on May 31, 2023 19:52:49 GMT
Personally I don't think you are a habitual liar but you have the same proclivity for economy of the truth as anyone else in these here parts. But if you want to be believed that you are going to / have sent an email to Ms Barry then something substantiating the claim is needed. However I expect you aren't interested in such things. Not a problem; no-one will lose any sleep over it.
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on May 31, 2023 19:54:54 GMT
DELTA9...just do it. it's the only way.
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on May 31, 2023 19:59:22 GMT
A bit like boat scam victim Naughtyfox telling me I was a liar when I said that I'd been to the Gambia, followed by me posting a photo of the Gambian entry and exit stamps in my passport, or telling me I was a liar when I said I had been refunded by Midland Chandlers for the defective batteries I bought followed by me posting a photo of the debit card refund printout then. A liar never believes a word anyone else says. So......................
Prove to the forum that Tony D is a convicted Child sex offender. Or shut the fuck up with your bullshit.
How's the window thing going?
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on May 31, 2023 20:00:12 GMT
Personally I don't think you are a habitual liar but you have the same proclivity for economy of the truth as anyone else in these here parts. But if you want to be believed that you are going to / have sent an email to Ms Barry then something substantiating the claim is needed. I have no intention of reproducing a private message on a public forum, neither do I wish to alert Tony Dunkley to the content of the email. You are welcome to believe or disbelieve anything you wish.
|
|
|
Post by fi on May 31, 2023 20:00:36 GMT
Personally I don't think you are a habitual liar but you have the same proclivity for economy of the truth as anyone else in these here parts. But if you want to be believed that you are going to / have sent an email to Ms Barry then something substantiating the claim is needed. However I expect you aren't interested in such things. Not a problem; no-one will lose any sleep over it. How many times does he have to accuse someone of something that he knows to be untrue, before he becomes an habitual liar?
|
|
|
Post by kris on May 31, 2023 20:41:51 GMT
A bit like boat scam victim Naughtyfox telling me I was a liar when I said that I'd been to the Gambia, followed by me posting a photo of the Gambian entry and exit stamps in my passport, or telling me I was a liar when I said I had been refunded by Midland Chandlers for the defective batteries I bought followed by me posting a photo of the debit card refund printout then. A liar never believes a word anyone else says. So......................
Prove to the forum that Tony D is a convicted Child sex offender. Or shut the fuck up with your bullshit.
Dunkleys donkey.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on May 31, 2023 20:48:04 GMT
Personally I don't think you are a habitual liar but you have the same proclivity for economy of the truth as anyone else in these here parts. But if you want to be believed that you are going to / have sent an email to Ms Barry then something substantiating the claim is needed. However I expect you aren't interested in such things. Not a problem; no-one will lose any sleep over it. I have sent you a PM.
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on May 31, 2023 21:00:48 GMT
Personally I don't think you are a habitual liar but you have the same proclivity for economy of the truth as anyone else in these here parts. But if you want to be believed that you are going to / have sent an email to Ms Barry then something substantiating the claim is needed. However I expect you aren't interested in such things. Not a problem; no-one will lose any sleep over it. How many times does he have to accuse someone of something that he knows to be untrue, before he becomes an habitual liar? But the dunk can make as many claims and insults as he likes and you expect Stabby to do nothing in response? Seems to show a deep lack of understanding of how this garbage works. Personally I don't get why you side with dunk; the man's a proven arsehole.
|
|
|
Post by fi on May 31, 2023 21:05:35 GMT
How many times does he have to accuse someone of something that he knows to be untrue, before he becomes an habitual liar? But the dunk can make as many claims and insults as he likes and you expect Stabby to do nothing in response? Seems to show a deep lack of understanding of how this garbage works. Personally I don't get why you side with dunk; the man's a proven arsehole. I dont side with either. Stabby is entitled to respond to Tony's insults but has chosen not to just do so with insults but lies, enough so to get googles attention.....
|
|
|
Post by on May 31, 2023 21:07:02 GMT
Personally I don't think you are a habitual liar but you have the same proclivity for economy of the truth as anyone else in these here parts. But if you want to be believed that you are going to / have sent an email to Ms Barry then something substantiating the claim is needed. However I expect you aren't interested in such things. Not a problem; no-one will lose any sleep over it. How many times does he have to accuse someone of something that he knows to be untrue, before he becomes an habitual liar? How would Mr Stabby know that the accusations he has made are not true? I suppose the accusation of having done time would be verifiable but I'm not sure how. I suppose it is a matter of public record. Unless you know someone very well it would be more or less impossible to definitely know someone was not a child abuser. You could know they were an abuser but it would be difficult to know for sure that they were not. I find it a bit similar to the Hitler thing with internet forums. It is too ridiculous for anyone to take seriously. It is one of those things. I think the victim of the accusation may have a case in law but the accuser in this case has obviously figured out that the accused has problems with executive function. In some ways one could view it as classic online bullying but at the end of the day the accused in this case has brought it on themselves. I think a fair bit of laughing might be happening about it all.
|
|