|
Post by Aloysius on Feb 17, 2023 16:30:52 GMT
What? More bullshit? I'm shocked.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Feb 18, 2023 10:44:59 GMT
The other thing the kiddy-fiddler seems to be glossing over is that CRT were granted the Section 8 notice before he ws declared bankrupt- in fact the latter was an attempt to avoid paying the costs awarded against him in the former. But even if the Official Receiver did have precedence over any money which could be recovered after the legal costs and the costs of towage and fumigation, then they would simply advise CRT of this whereupon CRT would do a BACS transfer of any surplus funds. Certainly nobody would be "annoyed" or "dismayed". The only thing that matters to anybody is that he no longer has the vessel. As this lying moronic psychopath has included his customary caption along the bottom of the quoted post, it is not unreasonable to presume that the term "kiddy-fiddler" refers to me. With regard to the nonsense contained within his reply, I would comment as follows. Section 8 Notices are notices ISSUED by the Canal & River Trust pursuant to the statutory powers of boat 'removal' (but ONLY from the craft's present location - under the terms of the British Waterways Act of 1983) in instances where vessels are "sunk, stranded, or abandoned", or "left or moored" in a waterway (or part of a waterway) under the Trust's control "without lawful authority". The C&RT [CRT] cannot be, and therefore are never, "granted" Section 8 Notices. The assertion that a Bankruptcy Order was made against me AFTER the C&RT were "granted the Section 8 Noticed" is therefore, not only factually and technically false, but also temporally incorrect. The Bankruptcy Order was in fact made some 11 months BEFORE the C&RT obtained an ultra vires, and therefore 'voidable', or possibly 'void ab initio' Order for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (note: NOT an Order, Warrant or Writ authorizing 'seizure') in respect of my boat ' Halcyon Daze'. The inescapable truth is that Parry's gang of crooks unlawfully seized two of my highest value assets AFTER they had already been lawfully seized by the Official Receiver. Vince ( Mr Stabby) Coventon's grasp and understanding of the Law, or fact and reality, is very much on a par with his personal, and apparently absent, standards of honesty or common decency.
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Feb 18, 2023 10:54:39 GMT
The other thing the kiddy-fiddler seems to be glossing over is that CRT were granted the Section 8 notice before he ws declared bankrupt- in fact the latter was an attempt to avoid paying the costs awarded against him in the former. But even if the Official Receiver did have precedence over any money which could be recovered after the legal costs and the costs of towage and fumigation, then they would simply advise CRT of this whereupon CRT would do a BACS transfer of any surplus funds. Certainly nobody would be "annoyed" or "dismayed". The only thing that matters to anybody is that he no longer has the vessel. As this lying moronic psychopath has included his customary caption along the bottom of the quoted post, it is not unreasonable to presume that the term "kiddy-fiddler" refers to me. Vince ( Mr Stabby) Coventon's grasp and understanding of the Law, or fact and reality, is very much on a par with his personal, and apparently absent, standards of honesty or common decency. Mr Stabby's hysterical screaming that you are a 'convicted paedophile' is based on the fact that you said something like you knew Jimmy Savile was a paedophile... apparently before most of the general public were aware. And that you had not reported this to the Police. As Stabby claims he knows you are one, has he reported this to the Police? If not, then by his own reasoning, he must be one too! 'The Beast of Brinklow' has a certain ring to it.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Feb 18, 2023 11:24:12 GMT
As this lying moronic psychopath has included his customary caption along the bottom of the quoted post, it is not unreasonable to presume that the term "kiddy-fiddler" refers to me. Vince ( Mr Stabby) Coventon's grasp and understanding of the Law, or fact and reality, is very much on a par with his personal, and apparently absent, standards of honesty or common decency. Mr Stabby's hysterical screaming that you are a 'convicted paedophile' is based on the fact that you said something like you knew Jimmy Savile was a paedophile... apparently before most of the general public were aware. And that you had not reported this to the Police. Not quite so ! What I actually said, or rather did, was to offend Shit-for-Brains by replying to a typically naive remark by his dear friend and ally, Alice, in which he described the whole nation as having been in thrall to Savile. I merely pointed out that the less gormless proportion of the UK population had harboured serious doubts about the creepy git - and Jimmy Savile - for a number of years. I do agree, though, . . the Shit-for-Brains Coventon reaction to what I said does in itself raise questions as to just what sort of practicing pervert he is himself, . . especially in light of that post you found about him being a 'flasher' on that bad driver reporting website. < rate-driver.co.uk/RE05UBU > That registration number, RE05 UBU is definitely the silver grey Shit-for-Brains Rover ! The link to the website, and a screenshot of the relevant post was included in the material that the Police have for use in evidence.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Feb 18, 2023 11:26:06 GMT
It must be difficult being so clever?
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Feb 18, 2023 11:27:40 GMT
The other thing the kiddy-fiddler seems to be glossing over is that CRT were granted the Section 8 notice before he ws declared bankrupt- in fact the latter was an attempt to avoid paying the costs awarded against him in the former. But even if the Official Receiver did have precedence over any money which could be recovered after the legal costs and the costs of towage and fumigation, then they would simply advise CRT of this whereupon CRT would do a BACS transfer of any surplus funds. Certainly nobody would be "annoyed" or "dismayed". The only thing that matters to anybody is that he no longer has the vessel. the C&RT obtained an ultra vires, and therefore 'voidable', or possibly 'void ab initio' Order for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief You forgot ad nauseam. Anyway it's certainly admirable that you somehow manage to keep the aspidistra flying, as it were. Best to keep it to yourself until the glorious day though, because you might otherwise gain the unenviable reputation of 'unhinged cranky old nutter'.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Feb 18, 2023 11:57:37 GMT
It must be difficult being so clever? You'd be the one to know, . . you vacuous moronic little shit !
|
|
|
Post by kris on Feb 18, 2023 12:08:02 GMT
So Tony you’ve never answered the question? Was it a deliberate act to get me to set my engines timing incorrectly. Or are you an incompetent moron?
|
|
|
Post by kris on Feb 18, 2023 12:57:33 GMT
You’ve usually got a lot to say Tony, but you always go quiet when I ask you this question. I wonder why?
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Feb 18, 2023 12:58:32 GMT
As this lying moronic psychopath has included his customary caption along the bottom of the quoted post, it is not unreasonable to presume that the term "kiddy-fiddler" refers to me. Vince ( Mr Stabby) Coventon's grasp and understanding of the Law, or fact and reality, is very much on a par with his personal, and apparently absent, standards of honesty or common decency. 'The Beast of Brinklow' has a certain ring to it. The Shit of Stretton has even more of a resonance !
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Feb 18, 2023 14:23:56 GMT
The Nonce of Nottinghamshire.
|
|
|
Post by on Feb 18, 2023 16:20:40 GMT
Yeah yeah yeah
And I was like
This is SO weird. O M G
BFF
See ya later alligator.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Feb 18, 2023 19:34:29 GMT
Mr Stabby's hysterical screaming that you are a 'convicted paedophile' is based on the fact that you said something like you knew Jimmy Savile was a paedophile... apparently before most of the general public were aware. And that you had not reported this to the Police. That registration number, RE05 UBU is definitely the silver grey Shit-for-Brains Rover ! The link to the website, and a screenshot of the relevant post was included in the material that the Police have for use in evidence. The Police don't have any "material for use in evidence", you silly little kiddy-fiddler. You may be able to fool some pre-pubescent girl into thinking there are some cute puppies in your caravan, or that Uncle Tony has some sweeties in his pocket but you really aren't fooling anyone here with this imaginary Police thing.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Feb 18, 2023 20:40:03 GMT
That registration number, RE05 UBU is definitely the silver grey Shit-for-Brains Rover ! The link to the website, and a screenshot of the relevant post was included in the material that the Police have for use in evidence. The Police don't have any "material for use in evidence", you silly little kiddy-fiddler. You may be able to fool some pre-pubescent girl into thinking there are some cute puppies in your caravan, or that Uncle Tony has some sweeties in his pocket but you really aren't fooling anyone here with this imaginary Police thing. The (civilian) contact you say you have at Warwickshire Police is letting you down rather badly. Perhaps she is looking forward to seeing the back of you too. Do you restrict your 'flashing' - exposing yourself to other road users - to only when driving your car [RE05 UBU], or do you indulge whilst at work as well ? < rate-driver.co.uk/RE05UBU >
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Feb 18, 2023 20:44:50 GMT
The Police don't have any "material for use in evidence", you silly little kiddy-fiddler. You may be able to fool some pre-pubescent girl into thinking there are some cute puppies in your caravan, or that Uncle Tony has some sweeties in his pocket but you really aren't fooling anyone here with this imaginary Police thing. Do you restrict your 'flashing' - exposing yourself to other road users - to only when driving your car [RE05 UBU], or do you indulge whilst at work as well ? You do realise from looking at the name of the person leaving that review that NaughtyFox wrote that, don't you? I mean, surely even you aren't that thick?
|
|