|
Post by Aloysius on Mar 4, 2023 22:12:42 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Mar 4, 2023 23:48:16 GMT
So why didn't you stop them taking your boat? Are you asking why I didn't stop them on the day, . . or why didn't I take pre-emptive action to stop them ? If it's the latter, . . then I did in fact do precisely that. Nottinghamshire Police were advised over a week earlier, in writing and with full details, that I had reason to believe that a fraudulent attempt to seize Halcyon Daze was imminent, and that the attempt would be made by bogus Bailiffs armed with only a Court Order for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief which they would try to pass off as a Writ or Warrant of Control, or some similar form of what is known as a 'seizure power'. If you're asking why I didn't stop them on the day, . . that was wholly down to the actions of the four thick ill-trained PC's who attended in response to C&RT's/ S.Garner's 999 call about me supposedly 'assaulting' the bogus Bailiffs. I was threatened with arrest, and spending at least the next few hours in a cell - with my dog being locked in the boat and taken away with the boat - if I didn't, in the words of the Nottinghamshire Police thicky in charge - "get off the boat and allow these men to get on with doing their job". Despite the information and warning, telephoned and e-mailed to the Police in early October 2020, detailing C&RT's likely MO for the anticipated fraudulent seizure of Halcyon Daze, it was clear from the words of the Nottinghamshire Police thicky in charge - by name and collar number, one Pc 1558 Cartwright - "get off the boat and allow these men to get on with doing their job" - that Nottinghamshire Police had completely ignored the information sent to them. It also, subsequently, became very apparent that no Nottinghamshire Police officers, . . including those who investigated my formal complaint concerning the performance and conduct the four Nottinghamshire Pc's who actively aided the C&RT instructed bogus Bailiffs in the unlawful/fraudulent seizure of my boat on 22 October 2020, . . possess either sufficient intelligence or training to enable them to distinguish between a Court Order for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, . . such as those that C&RT deceitfully obtain from the Courts with the intention of knowingly misusing and abusing, . . and a true 'seizure power/seizure order' in the form of such as a Writ or Warrant of Control.
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Mar 5, 2023 6:30:10 GMT
Each time you repeat it, somehow it manages to a bit more feculent than the last, and just goes to prove your bullshit will always be bullshit.
😃
|
|
|
Post by ‎ on Mar 5, 2023 7:22:28 GMT
I hope these thick coppers don't know where he lives.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Mar 5, 2023 7:40:10 GMT
Are you asking why I didn't stop them on the day, . . or why didn't I take pre-emptive action to stop them ? If it's the latter, . . then I did in fact do precisely that. Nottinghamshire Police were advised over a week earlier, in writing and with full details, that I had reason to believe that a fraudulent attempt to seize Halcyon Daze was imminent, and that the attempt would be made by bogus Bailiffs armed with only a Court Order for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief which they would try to pass off as a Writ or Warrant of Control, or some similar form of what is known as a 'seizure power'. If you're asking why I didn't stop them on the day, . . that was wholly down to the actions of the four thick ill-trained PC's who attended in response to C&RT's/ S.Garner's 999 call about me supposedly 'assaulting' the bogus Bailiffs. I was threatened with arrest, and spending at least the next few hours in a cell - with my dog being locked in the boat and taken away with the boat - if I didn't, in the words of the Nottinghamshire Police thicky in charge - "get off the boat and allow these men to get on with doing their job". Despite the information and warning, telephoned and e-mailed to the Police in early October 2020, detailing C&RT's likely MO for the anticipated fraudulent seizure of Halcyon Daze, it was clear from the words of the Nottinghamshire Police thicky in charge - by name and collar number, one Pc 1558 Cartwright - "get off the boat and allow these men to get on with doing their job" - that Nottinghamshire Police had completely ignored the information sent to them. It also, subsequently, became very apparent that no Nottinghamshire Police officers, . . including those who investigated my formal complaint concerning the performance and conduct the four Nottinghamshire Pc's who actively aided the C&RT instructed bogus Bailiffs in the unlawful/fraudulent seizure of my boat on 22 October 2020, . . possess either sufficient intelligence or training to enable them to distinguish between a Court Order for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, . . such as those that C&RT deceitfully obtain from the Courts with the intention of knowingly misusing and abusing, . . and a true 'seizure power/seizure order' in the form of such as a Writ or Warrant of Control. Maybe Nottinghamshire Police understand the Law and you don't?
|
|
|
Post by ‎ on Mar 5, 2023 8:07:22 GMT
They obviously don't understand it because they are thick.
It is entirely plausible that we just have someone who has a long term bad relationship with law enforcement. A lot of people do hate the police for various reasons.
If one were of that ilk then it would be difficult to have a good word to say about the rozzers.
Whatever they do they are thick idiots.
Generic response.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Mar 5, 2023 11:05:02 GMT
C&RT's sole reason for obtaining these Court Orders is not as told in the hypocritical dishonest piffle that is published on the Licensing/Enforcement pages of its website -- < canalrivertrust.org.uk/the-publication-scheme/governance/legal-documents/court-action-to-remove-boats-from-our-waterways > -- but is simply for the purpose of obtaining a piece of paper, complete with Court Seal, and the magic words - " If you do not obey Paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Order then you may be held in contempt of court and imprisoned or fined, or your assets may be seized." - printed one side of it. These pieces of paper - C&RT's much vaunted 'Court Orders' - are then fraudulently, in contempt of Court and due process, misrepresented to both the Police and the unfortunate targeted boatowner to facilitate what is in truth the wholly unlawful seizure of his or her boat/home by C&RT management's squads of bogus Bailiffs, thieving contractors, and lying Customer/Licence Support Officers. So why didn't you stop them taking your boat? Are you asking why I didn't stop them on the day, . . or why didn't I take pre-emptive action to stop them ? If it's the latter, . . then I did in fact do precisely that. Nottinghamshire Police were advised over a week earlier, in writing and with full details, that I had reason to believe that a fraudulent attempt to seize Halcyon Daze was imminent, and that the attempt would be made by bogus Bailiffs armed with only a Court Order for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief which they would try to pass off as a Writ or Warrant of Control, or some similar form of what is known as a 'seizure power'. If you're asking why I didn't stop them on the day, . . that was wholly down to the actions of the four thick ill-trained PC's who attended in response to C&RT's/ S.Garner's 999 call about me supposedly 'assaulting' the bogus Bailiffs. I was threatened with arrest, and spending at least the next few hours in a cell - with my dog being locked in the boat and taken away with the boat - if I didn't, in the words of the Nottinghamshire Police thicky in charge - "get off the boat and allow these men to get on with doing their job".
|
|
|
Post by kris on Mar 5, 2023 11:17:33 GMT
I think you’ve said this before Tony. Repeating it over and over doesn’t make it true.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Mar 5, 2023 11:24:04 GMT
I think you’ve said this before Tony. Repeating it over and over doesn’t make it true. Your details, including your location/postal address, are required for the purpose of an investigation into your internet activities under Sections 1), 2), and 2A) of the Protection from Harrassment Act 1997. It's doubtful that you'll have either the honesty or the backbone to reveal any of the required information on the internet. You can therefore provide them via Thunderboat PM or e-mail to < Tonydtrent@gmail.com >.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Mar 5, 2023 11:33:11 GMT
So why didn't you stop them taking your boat? I was threatened with arrest, and spending at least the next few hours in a cell - with my dog being locked in the boat and taken away with the boat Why didn't you leave the dog at home when you got the phone call to say the enforcement agents had turned up at your boat then?
|
|
|
Post by ‎ on Mar 5, 2023 11:42:53 GMT
It is interesting there is no provision for pets of arrested persons.
I wonder if the rspca know about this.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Mar 5, 2023 12:14:33 GMT
I think you’ve said this before Tony. Repeating it over and over doesn’t make it true. Your details, including your location/postal address, are required for the purpose of an investigation into your internet activities under Sections 1), 2), and 2A) of the Protection from Harrassment Act 1997. It's doubtful that you'll have either the honesty or the backbone to reveal any of the required information on the internet. You can therefore provide them via Thunderboat PM or e-mail to < Tonydtrent@gmail. com >. Yes yes Tony something else you’ve said before, that doesn’t become true by repetition. You’ve got my email and phone number your welcome to give them to the police. Or provide a crime ref number and the name of the police officer investigating. I’m quite happy to contact them and have a conversation directly about yourself.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Mar 5, 2023 12:14:57 GMT
It is interesting there is no provision for pets of arrested persons. I wonder if the rspca know about this. Your details, including your location/postal address, are required for the purpose of an investigation into your internet activities under Sections 1), 2), and 2A) of the Protection from Harrassment Act 1997. It's doubtful that you'll have either the honesty or the backbone to reveal any of the required information on the internet. You can therefore provide them via Thunderboat PM or e-mail to < Tonydtrent@gmail. com >.
|
|
|
Post by ‎ on Mar 5, 2023 12:29:09 GMT
Sir Andrew Bennett Lord of the Manners.
The rest is easy to find.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Mar 5, 2023 12:33:19 GMT
Sir Andrew Bennett Lord of the Manners. The rest is easy to find. I don’t think he wants your details, your not important enough.
|
|