|
Post by frunobulax on Apr 21, 2023 0:21:42 GMT
They wouldn't get through the rear doors, It looks like he has set up a snare...
|
|
|
Post by dyertribe on Apr 21, 2023 6:24:47 GMT
The Wiltshire Times is quoting Dunk as a 'canal expert'. Oh dear. Well, an ex is a has-been and a spurt is a drip under pressure……
|
|
|
Post by on Apr 21, 2023 8:22:47 GMT
For some people it seems to be a family outing. Why take the children here? Not appropriate. Is this particular geyser the thin end of the wedge by any chance? Are there a load more around the corner and some of them with children? I can't see positive outcomes for other boat owners in general from this apart from with any luck having the eyesore removed entirely. How can anyone in their right mind think this kind of thing might be acceptable? Even on privately owned land this sort of thing gets prevented from happening if there are neighbours. For it to happen on a public footpath is just pikeyesque really. Nobody likes this. Why take the kids?
To be fair, some of the blame does lie with the CRT. They should be more proactive with towpath land management.
On my CRT residential mooring if we leave things on the pontoon when they want to pressure was the boards anything left there will be binned. They say they will do it and they do it.
What the CRT should really do is inform people leaving trash on the towpath that it must be removed or will be disposed of within x weeks and have a workboat which goes along and just clear the junk.
Letting it build up like that makes it a much more difficult job later and just creates the wrong environment for the hundreds of other people who use the towpath.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2023 8:29:47 GMT
For some people it seems to be a family outing. Why take the children here? Not appropriate. Is this particular geyser the thin end of the wedge by any chance? Are there a load more around the corner and some of them with children? (Assumption) I can't see positive outcomes for other boat owners in general from this apart from with any luck having the eyesore removed entirely. How can anyone in their right mind think this kind of thing might be acceptable? Even on privately owned land this kind of thing gets prevented from happening if there are neighbours. For it to happen on a public footpath is just pikeyesque really. Nobody likes this. (It's not a public footpath) Why take the kids? (Life experience?)
|
|
|
Post by on Apr 21, 2023 8:33:29 GMT
I can just see the kid asking "Daddy, are they going to come and do that to our boat?"
Seems wrong. It isn't a spectator sport. Or maybe it is.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Apr 21, 2023 8:36:23 GMT
The following account, relating to the public exposure of C&RT Ltd's long term fraudulent misuse and abuse of its statutory powers under Section 8 of the British Waterways Act 1983 will also be posted elsewhere, . . but I think it appropriate to repeat it here - for as many times as necessary - if only as something of an antidote to the sheer volume of mindless garbage deposited on this thread by the members of the Thunderboat mental cripples club, . . and, more importantly, to give C&RT Ltd CEO Richard Parry, and Company Secretary, Book Cooker in Chief, and Head of Illegal and Connivance Services, Tom Deards, something to ponder, when it's reported back to them by their squads of internet stooges.
_____________________________________________________
This C&RT Ltd fiasco and undoing, staged on 19 April 2023 at Bradford-on-Avon, was attended in person by C&RT Ltd's Solicitor-Advocate, Lucy Barry, and her equally dishonest colleague, Matthew Aymes, the Trust's national Customer and Licence Support manager (sic). I was pleased to have my good wishes passed on to them both via people that I was in direct contact with, and who were on site throughout the whole day.
A big 'thank you and well done' is due to a Wiltshire Police Sgt, who, fortunately for George Ward, and a great many others, knew and understood the powers and limitations of the (Declaratory & Injunctive Relief) Court Order with which C&RT Ltd were, after first unlawfully evicting him from, were fraudulently and in contempt of Court intending unlawfully to 'seize' and transport away the boat on which George Ward is living.
It must go on record that the Police Sgt's conduct and handling of the situation was correct to the letter of the law and wholly in order, . . in sharp contrast with the four thick ill-trained Nottinghamshire Police officers who attended and actively assisted C&RT Ltd and Commercial Boat Services bogus Bailiffs in the fraudulent seizure and ultimate theft of my boat Halcyon Daze on 22 October 2020.
It must also be noted at this stage that, since being exposed for the frauds they were, and proof of their true status being put into Police and other evidence, the C&RT Ltd/Commercial Boat Services (bogus) Bailiffs have now been redesignated - by professional liar and C&RT Ltd Solicitor-Advocate Lucy Barry - as "contracted security operatives", . . the guise in which they arrived in Bradford-on-Avon on 19 April, assuming that the Police would be evicting George Ward from his boat/home and then detaining or restraining him whilst their Commercial Boat Services colleagues towed it away.
I doubt, but sincerely hope, that the C&RT Ltd, having made a failed and wholly unlawful attempt on 19 April 2023 to enforce the fining, imprisonment or asset seizure sanctions specified in a printed (on the Court Order) warning relating to non-compliance with paras 2) & 3) of the Injunction section of the Court Order, . . in law and in Court procedures, the sole preserve of the Courts to apply and enforce, . . will now be so foolish as to go back to the Court to ask it to enforce the very same non-compliance sanctions that it has so recently, unsuccessfully, and unlawfully, attempted to enforce itself.
The C&RT's 19 April 2023 calculated and knowing misuse and of the (Court) Order for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief that this so-called charitable Trust obtained against George Ward has left its dishonest management and lawyers in something of a quandary. Asking the Court to enforce the fining, imprisonment or asset seizure sanctions listed in the printed warning that accompanies every Injunction Order the Courts make, . . only after first making an illegal abortive attempt to enforce it themselves, and with the unwitting assistance of the Police, . . will of course leave Deards, Barry, Aymes & co. in the position of having to explain away every previous occasion on which they have taken it upon themselves to contemptuously assume the role and powers of the Court in unlawfully seizing and disposing of targeted boatowners homes and/or assets without the Court's approval or authority so to do.
The lid has finally been very publicly blown off C&RT Ltd and Commercial Boat Services criminal activities, . . and the way is now open for everyone who has had a boat and contents unlawfully seized by this so-called charitable Trust and its crooked contractors to initiate the process of recovering their stolen goods and property.
On 19 April 2023, at Bradford-on-Avon, C&RT Ltd's team of retained boat thieves were stopped in their tracks because for the first time, ever, they were unlucky enough to encounter an intelligent and well trained Police officer who recognised the fact that the Court Order, . . under which C&RT Ltd and its re-invented "contracted security operatives" (former bogus Bailiffs) were intending, with the by now customary and taken for granted Police assistance, to unlawfully evict a boatowner from their home/boat and fraudulently and in contempt of Court seize and transport away a Section 8'd boat, . . did NOT in reality confer any such power or authority, . . or order the execution of any such action.
All this is obviously very difficult and confusing for some of the mental cripples both on here, on CWDF, at C&RT Ltd, and at Commercial Boat Services, who would rather not, or cannot, grasp or understand any of these simple truths and facts, . . but when all's said and done, that's their problem.
On Wednesday 19 April 2023, the luck of a great many past victims of C&RT Ltd's dishonesty, contempt for the law, and for common decency, took a turn for the better, . . C&RT Ltd's luck, on the other hand, ran out, . . and it was all thanks to a decent, right-thinking, and well trained Police Officer who saw through the fraudulently misrepresented Court Order, and through all the customary and well rehearsed misdirections and lies being peddled by C&RT Ltd's Matthew Aymes and Lucy Barry.
|
|
|
Post by on Apr 21, 2023 8:39:48 GMT
More likely it was a bit public. If they need to go in and remove him from the boat perhaps a towpath closure would be better otherwise it'll be a sport and it isn't actually appropriate for people to be watching this.
|
|
|
Post by Arthur on Apr 21, 2023 8:44:53 GMT
They just need one officer to talk to George through a gap in the door and secretly tazer him, then get a few of the thick ill trained Nottinghamshire officers to drag him out and say he had a heart attack.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Apr 21, 2023 8:49:25 GMT
More likely it was a bit public. If they need to go in and remove him from the boat perhaps a towpath closure would be better otherwise it'll be a sport and it isn't actually appropriate for people to be watching this. why is it not appropriate? The fact that there are people there has helped George. As for the kids what would you recommend? Maybe get a nanny in for the day?
|
|
|
Post by on Apr 21, 2023 8:58:34 GMT
We've never used a nanny and would not consider it. Not a single time since the kids were born. There must be a park somewhere they would like to play rather than watch armed police wandering around. krisTaking out the human side of it and thinking about the actual situation do you think this is an acceptable way for someone to behave? A lot of general detritus on the towpath and according to some reports an attitude problem with public. Someone camps up in a park and causes a nuisance they are gone fast. The police will follow them out of the borough. It is an interesting question because some people might think it is alright. I don't think all that many people would support it if a hundred other people were doing it but sometimes if there is just one then it can work ok.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2023 9:05:42 GMT
We've never used a nanny and would not consider it. Not a single time since the kids were born. There must be a park somewhere they would like to play rather than watch armed police wandering around. kris Taking out the human side of it and thinking about the actual situation do you think this is an acceptable way for someone to behave? A lot of general detritus on the towpath and according to some reports an attitude problem with public. Someone camps up in a park and causes a nuisance they are gone fast. The police will follow them out of the borough. It is an interesting question because some people might think it is alright. I don't think all that many people would support it if a hundred other people were doing it but sometimes if there is just one then it can work ok. I'm quite intrigued but somewhat bemused by your sudden interest in the welfare of other peoples kids. Your track record on the subject is questionable given some of your own posts on here with reference to your own form of parenting.
|
|
|
Post by on Apr 21, 2023 9:10:53 GMT
That is an interesting comment. Can you expand on this?
I'm not particularly bothered about other people's children it just seems dodgy to be involving them in incidents of this sort.
It is not impossible that at some stage the geyser gets forcibly removed from the boat and it could be a bit ugly. Do we want children to be involved in this?
Really?
ETA I'll have you know my parenting is faultless. I don't know what sort of nonsense I have posted on here but at least half of it is made up on the spot.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Apr 21, 2023 9:16:46 GMT
We've never used a nanny and would not consider it. Not a single time since the kids were born. There must be a park somewhere they would like to play rather than watch armed police wandering around. krisTaking out the human side of it and thinking about the actual situation do you think this is an acceptable way for someone to behave? A lot of general detritus on the towpath and according to some reports an attitude problem with public. Someone camps up in a park and causes a nuisance they are gone fast. The police will follow them out of the borough. It is an interesting question because some people might think it is alright. I don't think all that many people would support it if a hundred other people were doing it but sometimes if there is just one then it can work ok. personally I’m not so hung up on someone living on the towpath. As for George’s behaviour, I can’t really comment because I’m not on that end of the K&A. He seems to be liked by other boaters, there are people willing to give up their time to help him. Which is more than can be said for Tony. So I don’t know what he’s like as a person. I would support people standing up to laws and authorities that they don’t feel are just or right. This country is becoming a “third world,” country. So we are going to see lots of people living on the streets or in tents on bits of land everywhere. It’s not really the peoples fault so penalisng them making them criminals isn’t a solution.
|
|
|
Post by on Apr 21, 2023 9:18:52 GMT
I don't mind people living on the towpath at all. I do think that this sort of thing is putting at risk the existence of this option.
Do it nice and tidily and it isn't a problem. Pile shite up around the boat and it is a problem.
Very good point about the third world. You are correct about this.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Apr 21, 2023 9:22:05 GMT
I don't mind people living on the towpath at all. I do think that this sort of thing is putting at risk the existence of this option. Do it nice and tidily and it isn't a problem. Pile shite up around the boat and it is a problem. Very good point about the third world. You are correct about this. Living on boats is at threat anyway, you can’t blame that on one person. George might even make it harder for crt to remove people from their homes. So protecting living on a boat.
|
|