|
Post by Tony Dunkley on May 12, 2023 15:49:53 GMT
Hello Bod, . . it's good to see you here again, . . decent, right-thinking, sane, sensible people are a bit thin on the ground round these parts at the moment, . . have been for a while. Neither of George Ward's boats were registered as houseboats under the terms of the 1971 Act, . . and nor should they have been, because they don't fit the definition of a 'houseboat' laid down in S.3(1) the 1971 Act. Houseboats are not in fact subject to any form of licensing at all, . . only, as you say, to registration by means of a 'houseboat certificate'. The law in respect of mooring, placing, keeping or maintaining a houseboat on any inland waterway for the time being under C&RT(Ltd)'s control is laid down and defined in S.13 of the 1971 Act. The legal requirement for a current 'houseboat certificate was introduced in S.13(1) and the terms/rules of houseboat legislation as a whole, including C&RT(Ltd)'s obligations with regard to issuing certificates, in subsections (2,3,4,5,6, and 7) of Section 13, and Sections 14,15,16,17, 18 and 19 of the same Act. The above houseboat laws/legislation remains in force, unamended, to this day, . . and is carried over into the terms/rules/laws laid down in the 1995 Act in Section 17(1) of that Act. If you were wondering why C&RT(Ltd)'s lawyers lie to the Courts about the true definition of a houseboat and drag S.13 of the 1971 Act into its inappropriate CPR Part 8 Declaration/Injunction Claims, it's because the removal/demolition powers under S.13 of the 1971 Act are less restrictive and more draconian than the boat removal powers under Section 8 of the 1983 Act, . . which of course, . . to inflict as much grief on targeted boatowners as they possibly can, they also mislead and lie to the Courts about.
|
|
|
Post by on May 12, 2023 16:01:03 GMT
Your imaginary friends are reasonably amusing to hear about but it doesn't half get boring after a while. How is Pangelique or whatever her name is anyway? Evangeline? Its the name of a boat at Henley. Quite a nice old Humber Keel.
|
|
|
Post by on May 12, 2023 16:03:36 GMT
CRT have the boat. Fact. They also have both of your boats. Nothing is going to alter this basic reality. You need to deal with it in order to move on.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on May 12, 2023 16:25:09 GMT
Several non-posting members and Thunderboat guests are again asking why the usual bunch of lamebrains are fixating on Aymes' predictably evasive nonsense non-reply of 5 May 2023 And how are these Thunderboat guests asking this, given that Thunderboat guests cannot send private messages? and 5 hours ago the moronic psychopath also said: "These will be the "Thunderboat guests" who are rather strangely able to send private messages without being logged in I presume. Unless of course they are, as you suggest, imaginary." __________________________________________________________________________________ I've had a message from a Thunderboat guest follower drawing attention to the above examples of how Mr Shit-for-Brains processes whatever it is that passes through his head in place of anything resembling what might be called thoughts. Made me chuckle a lot.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on May 12, 2023 16:37:55 GMT
It's quite simple, you thick as mince kiddy-fiddler. Anyone here can log out, in which case their status will become "guest", and then try to send someone a private message.
|
|
|
Post by The Cat Man on May 12, 2023 16:41:10 GMT
Ever heard of email messages.....
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on May 12, 2023 17:40:52 GMT
Ever heard of email messages..... Big mouth, . . . played right that would have had Mr Shit-for-Brains making even more of a fool of himself than usual.
|
|
|
Post by The Cat Man on May 12, 2023 17:48:58 GMT
Soz....
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on May 12, 2023 17:58:52 GMT
No one was removed forcibly or otherwise ... one of them may have carried a bus pass but I guess he wasn't trying to catch a number 23 ! Rog George Ward was forcibly prevented from getting back onto his boat by Brian Clarke/CBS's bogus Bailiffs "contracted security operatives", . . while the Police looked on, . . and while some of the contents and personal belongings were thrown out of the boat on to the towpath. Where, and from what, do you suppose the lawful authority/enforcement power for anyone to do that came from, . . and how do you think the Police participation in what is unquestionably a CIVIL matter can be explained ?
|
|
|
Post by on May 12, 2023 18:09:40 GMT
Quite a lot of my followers have messaged me to say they would join in on the forum if we could get of the idiotic troll from Nuttinghamshire.
Sadly I have mentioned we arrr finding him very hard to shake off.
Never mind.
It is impressive how many people do follow but never post. My email is always full.
I even get valentines messages !
|
|
|
Post by dogless on May 12, 2023 18:12:58 GMT
The boat was seized (unoccupied) and rightly removed as ordered.
It's done !
12 years is much too long, but it's finally over.
I hope George accepts some of the meaningful assistance he has to date declined ... not a happy ending but an ending.
Rog
|
|
|
Post by The Cat Man on May 12, 2023 18:24:32 GMT
I even get valentines messages !
|
|
|
Post by bod on May 12, 2023 18:30:36 GMT
Hello Bod, . . it's good to see you here again, . . decent, right-thinking, sane, sensible people are a bit thin on the ground round these parts at the moment, . . have been for a while. Neither of George Ward's boats were registered as houseboats under the terms of the 1971 Act, . . and nor should they have been, because they don't fit the definition of a 'houseboat' laid down in S.3(1) the 1971 Act. Houseboats are not in fact subject to any form of licensing at all, . . only, as you say, to registration by means of a 'houseboat certificate'. The law in respect of mooring, placing, keeping or maintaining a houseboat on any inland waterway for the time being under C&RT(Ltd)'s control is laid down and defined in S.13 of the 1971 Act. The legal requirement for a current 'houseboat certificate was introduced in S.13(1) and the terms/rules of houseboat legislation as a whole, including C&RT(Ltd)'s obligations with regard to issuing certificates, in subsections (2,3,4,5,6, and 7) of Section 13, and Sections 14,15,16,17, 18 and 19 of the same Act. The above houseboat laws/legislation remains in force, unamended, to this day, . . and is carried over into the terms/rules/laws laid down in the 1995 Act in Section 17(1) of that Act. If you were wondering why C&RT(Ltd)'s lawyers lie to the Courts about the true definition of a houseboat and drag S.13 of the 1971 Act into its inappropriate CPR Part 8 Declaration/Injunction Claims, it's because the removal/demolition powers under S.13 of the 1971 Act are less restrictive and more draconian than the boat removal powers under Section 8 of the 1983 Act, . . which of course, . . to inflict as much grief on targeted boatowners as they possibly can, they also mislead and lie to the Courts about. So if niether boat was registered as a "Houseboat" then the whole 1971 section 13, was in this case tolally invalid.
Bod
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on May 12, 2023 18:36:15 GMT
The boat was seized (unoccupied) and rightly removed as ordered. Rog " Ordered " by whom, . . the Court 'ordered' no such thing, . . not seizure, nor removal from the waterway. The Order made against George Ward at Bristol County Court on 23 January 2023 'declared' that C&RT(Ltd) was entitled to act pursuant to its statutory powers under Section 8 of the BW Act 1983. C&RT(Ltd)'s statutory powers under S.8 of the 1983 BW Act DO NOT extend to 'seizure' or the removal of any craft or vessel FROM any inland waterway under its [C&RT(Ltd)] control.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on May 12, 2023 18:43:11 GMT
"You're going to look such a twat when the boat gets towed away next month Tony. Why don't you stick to subjects you actually know something about, like sexually abusing pre-pubescent girls?" (April 25th)
"Dunkley's going to look an even bigger cunt than usual when the boat is taken away, craned out and driven off to Chester sometime early next month". (April 25th)
"When March Hare is removed from the waterway early next month, hopefully the idiot Tony Dunkley will have the decency to fall on his sword and not offer his inane and totally incorrect interpretation of the Law on Thunderboat or anywhere else". (April 26th)
"You're going to look such a twat when George Ward's boat is towed away next week Tony". (May 3rd)
"So what are you going to say when the boat gets towed away this week?" (May 8th)
|
|