|
Post by Tony Dunkley on May 24, 2023 17:34:35 GMT
The Wiltshire Times original headline - Boater finally evicted by Canal and River Trust after legal battle - is not a true reflection of the events that occured on the canal at Bradford-on-Avon on 19 April and 11 May 2023. It is the situation as the C&RT(Ltd) wanted it portrayed to the public, and entirely down to the lies and misinformation fed to the media by C&RT(Ltd)'s own Legal Fiction & Connivance Services. It is a gross distortion of what actually happened, and why it hapened, to George Ward and his two boats on those dates.
George Ward was forcibly evicted - illegally - from the boat he lived aboard, prior to both boats being seized - again, illegally - by C&RT(Ltd) contractors fraudulently acting as Bailiffs, . . although on this occasion not fraudulently misrepresented as such.
The most seriously corncerning aspect of this latest C&RT(Ltd) festival of illegal activity is that the unlawful eviction and boat seizures were executed with the approval of and under the supervision of the Police after they had been falsely led to believe - ie. convincingly and wilfully lied to - by a Trust senior manager, Matthew Aymes, and its senior Solicitor-Advocate, Lucy Barry, to the effect that a routine, run-of-the-mill Declaration/Injunction Court Order that 'ordered' NOTHING beyond the terms of a simple civil Injunction forbidding George Ward from using or keeping his two boats on C&RT(Ltd) controlled waters, gave the C&RT(Ltd) itself powers of eviction and seizure of goods and property equivalent to Court authorised/certificated Enforcement Officers/Agents [Bailiffs] acting under the direct and specific instructions/orders of a Court.
The Declaration/Injunction Court Order under which C&RT(Ltd) perpetrated this criminal and in contempt of Court deception was obtained by the C&RT(Ltd) in a short 'rubber stamping' exercise of a hearing at Bristol County Court on 23 January 2023. It was enforceable ONLY on the express authority of and by the Court itself, . . as are ALL such Orders, without exception.
In acting in the manner in which they did the C&RT(Ltd) personnel present, Matthew Aymes and Lucy Barry, were in serious Contempt of Court whilst simultaneously committing the offences of Fraud by False Representation and Misconduct in Public Office.
In becoming actively involved in what is, and always has been, a wholly civil dispute and assisting the C&RT(Ltd) to evict George Ward and seize his home, property and belongings, the Police acted unlawfully and outside their own powers and jurisdiction -- the Police have no right or authority to act or intervene in civil matters.
NOT exactly a "legal battle", . . more of a disgraceful sham involving wilful contempt of Court and conspiracy to defraud by the C&RT(Ltd), . . and a shameful, to say nothing of unlawful, performance by a Police force that allowed itself to be suckered into acting outside its remit, and the law, by a glib tongued bent lawyer with a track record, known to this writer, of professional misconduct and dishonesty.
|
|
|
Post by on May 24, 2023 17:37:43 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on May 24, 2023 17:39:39 GMT
"You're going to look such a twat when the boat gets towed away next month Tony. Why don't you stick to subjects you actually know something about, like sexually abusing pre-pubescent girls?" (April 25th)
"Dunkley's going to look an even bigger cunt than usual when the boat is taken away, craned out and driven off to Chester sometime early next month". (April 25th)
"When March Hare is removed from the waterway early next month, hopefully the idiot Tony Dunkley will have the decency to fall on his sword and not offer his inane and totally incorrect interpretation of the Law on Thunderboat or anywhere else". (April 26th)
"You're going to look such a twat when George Ward's boat is towed away next week Tony". (May 3rd)
"So what are you going to say when the boat gets towed away this week?" (May 8th)
|
|
|
Post by on May 24, 2023 18:17:40 GMT
What are the disadvantages of transactional analysis? One drawback of TA is that it necessitates a high level of self-awareness. Some clients may not be able to look at and notice their own behaviour and thought patterns.
----
Speaking from experience people in the autism spectrum often have significant deficits when it comes to basic self awareness.
If, as I suspect, Tony is ASD this could be a significant hurdle which may make TA therapy ineffective.
It may be unhelpful at this stage to get into the 'Refrigerator Mother' theory !
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on May 24, 2023 22:53:20 GMT
TonyDunkley Just as you got it wrong with the BSS, the name-calling is what they will nail you with, not the legal disagreement. Shame you didn't learn much from Nigel, calm, firm and legally correct is the way. You might have been able to justify your posts without the interminable insults, but as with the Stunned Kingfisher and The Hesperus, you have scuppered your own ship. I haven't got anything wrong, Jim, . . not with the BSSC, . . or anything else before or after that. My long running dispute with and opposition to the C&RT(Ltd), what it has done, what it continues to do, and the way it behaves and conducts its business in general, is founded in the premise that a Government controlled, public body, statutory navigation authority must abide by the legislation that was put in place for the sole purpose of governing and regulating it, . . in every aspect, down to the last detail, and without exception. C&RT(Ltd), and some of the people responsible for controlling and running it, fall a long way short of that expectation, in terms of both ability, common decency, and integrity. That's not acceptable. Your thoughts and opinions regarding me and Nigel Moore could NOT be any further wide of the mark. You don't know enough about either of us to make such an assessment or comparison. If you had known Nigel rather better than simply by reading his posts on here and CWDF, you would be in a considerably better qualified to make sweeping statements about what you, mistakenly, think I needed to learn from him. There are a couple of posts of Nigel's back somewhere in the Thunderboat archives that you, and many others, would find something of an eye-opener, . . especially with regard to my interactions with C&RT(Ltd) over the question of the BSSC for Halcyon Daze, . . a subject that you, and others of the mass ill-informed, repeatedly feel the need to spout confused nonsense about. I'll see if I can find them a bit later on. I've found the two posts I mentioned above. You'll find them well worth reading, . . and the thread they're both from. Recognizing the truth about what's happening in the world around you isn't all that difficult, . . just needs an open mind and a willingness to think for yourself -- rather than lapping up the mindless drivel posted by the terminally stupid. < thunderboat.boards.net/post/209116/thread > and < thunderboat.boards.net/post/209338/thread >
|
|
|
Post by kris on May 24, 2023 23:00:07 GMT
And in honour of Tina turner
|
|
|
Post by kris on May 28, 2023 8:20:28 GMT
Touting for work again Tony?
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on May 28, 2023 9:00:46 GMT
Yesterday Tony Dunkley said:
C&RT(Ltd) didn't have a 'Section 8 Order' when it stole the first boat from George Ward on 19 April 2023, and then illegally evicted him from the second boat, on 11 May 2023, prior to stealing that too.
There's no such thing as a 'Section 8 Order', . . what this idiot actually means is the CPR Part 8 Declaration/Injunction Order that C&RT(Ltd) wilfully misled Bristol County Court into making on 23 January 2023, . . the same 'Court Order' that Matthew Aymes and Lucy Barry then lied to Wiltshire Police about to con them into getting involved in a wholly civil dispute ? If so, there's no point to make, . . the Order was void from the moment it was made -- same wording as the 15 August 2019 Halcyon Daze Order.
All of C&RT(Ltd)'s Injunction and boat removal Declaration Orders are void from the moment they're made by virtue of the stated effect of paragraph 1) in relation to the true position/situation in respect of the 'lawful authority' for 'relevant craft' to be kept or used on C&RT(Ltd) controlled PRN river waterways listed in Schedule 1 to the British Waterways Act 1971 (as amended).
The terms of the Injunctions - paras 2) and 3) of the Orders exceed the power and authority of both the Court and the C&RT(Ltd) with resect to the Public Right of Navigation in that the wording of paras 2) and 3) of the Orders forbids the ". . navigating, mooring, or securing of the [subject craft] on any part of the Claimant's waterways" -- phraseology that encompasses the PRN river waterways listed in Schedule 1 to the British Waterways Act 1971 (as amended).
No Court has the jurisdiction or power to reassign the effect of or amend statute, . . or to make an Order that has the effect of suspending, withdrawing, or extinguishing the extant Public Right of Navigation in respect of any particular named craft or vessel on any particular PRN waterway. Making an Order that purports to do so renders that Order void ab initio.
_______________________________________________________________________
Thank you to all those who've responded to the above via text or e-mail. What's needed now are more names and contact details for everyone or anyone who's had boat 'seized' by C&RT(Ltd) after being issued with a Section 8 Notice -- residential or otherwise, with or without one of the pointless/worthless Court Orders, . . and irrespective of whether or not the owner has signed the disclaimer form that C&RT(Ltd) usually try it on with.
If you've been a victim of this long running fraud, or know anyone who has, please contact me at : --
< Tonydtrent@gmail.com > or on 07903 063179
. . . . or simply ignore the ill-intentioned, or the just plain vacuous, who are doing their best to finish the forum off and to get it closed down, . . and join Thunderboat as a new active member. At one time, before the trolls hi-jacked it, Thunderboat had grown from its inauspicious beginnings into the livliest and most interesting boating forum on the internet, . . it could be so again !
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on May 28, 2023 10:21:06 GMT
Yesterday Tony Dunkley said: please contact me at : --
< Tonydtrent@gmail.com > or on 07903 063179
Just a reminder to all that spambots trawl internet forums looking for email addresses and mobile phone numbers which they then sell on to spam email senders and fraudsters, and while the vast majority of folk are intelligent enough not to post this information in a format which a spambot can recognise, that if somebody does lack this intelligence it is important not to include their email address and phone number in any posts of theirs one quotes, since this is likely to attract unwanted attention to them.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on May 28, 2023 11:09:47 GMT
Yesterday Tony Dunkley said:
"C&RT(Ltd) didn't have a 'Section 8 Order' when it stole the first boat from George Ward on 19 April 2023, and then illegally evicted him from the second boat, on 11 May 2023, prior to stealing that too."
There's no such thing as a 'Section 8 Order', . . what this idiot actually means is the CPR Part 8 Declaration/Injunction Order that C&RT(Ltd) wilfully misled Bristol County Court into making on 23 January 2023, . . the same 'Court Order' that Matthew Aymes and Lucy Barry then lied to Wiltshire Police about to con them into getting involved in a wholly civil dispute ? If so, there's no point to make, . . the Order was void from the moment it was made -- same wording as the 15 August 2019 Halcyon Daze Order.
All of C&RT(Ltd)'s Injunction and boat removal Declaration Orders are void from the moment they're made by virtue of the stated effect of paragraph 1) in relation to the true position/situation in respect of the 'lawful authority' for 'relevant craft' to be kept or used on C&RT(Ltd) controlled PRN river waterways listed in Schedule 1 to the British Waterways Act 1971 (as amended).
The terms of the Injunctions - paras 2) and 3) of the Orders exceed the power and authority of both the Court and the C&RT(Ltd) with resect to the Public Right of Navigation in that the wording of paras 2) and 3) of the Orders forbids the ". . navigating, mooring, or securing of the [subject craft] on any part of the Claimant's waterways" -- phraseology that encompasses the PRN river waterways listed in Schedule 1 to the British Waterways Act 1971 (as amended).
No Court has the jurisdiction or power to reassign the effect of or amend statute, . . or to make an Order that has the effect of suspending, withdrawing, or extinguishing the extant Public Right of Navigation in respect of any particular named craft or vessel on any particular PRN waterway. Making an Order that purports to do so renders that Order void ab initio.
_______________________________________________________________________
Thank you to all those who've responded to the above via text or e-mail. What's needed now are more names and contact details for everyone or anyone who's had boat 'seized' by C&RT(Ltd) after being issued with a Section 8 Notice -- residential or otherwise, with or without one of the pointless/worthless Court Orders, . . and irrespective of whether or not the owner has signed the disclaimer form that C&RT(Ltd) usually try it on with.
If you've been a victim of this long running fraud, or know anyone who has, please contact me at : --
< Tonydtrent@gmail.com > or on 07903 063179 >
. . . . or simply ignore the ill-intentioned, or the just plain vacuous, who are doing their best to finish the forum off and to get it closed down, . . and join Thunderboat as a new active member. At one time, before the trolls hi-jacked it, Thunderboat had grown from its inauspicious beginnings into the livliest and most interesting boating forum on the internet, . . it could be so again !
|
|
|
Post by kris on May 28, 2023 11:12:39 GMT
So any way Tony, how’s George doing his he okay? Has he got somewhere to stay or is he living in a tent on the towpath? Or do you not care about mr ward?
|
|
|
Post by kris on May 28, 2023 11:26:45 GMT
So any way Tony, how’s George doing his he okay? Has he got somewhere to stay or is he living in a tent on the towpath? Or do you not care about mr ward?
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on May 28, 2023 14:30:18 GMT
There's no such thing as a 'Section 8 Order', . . If you asked a hundred boaters what a Section 8 Order was, a hundred boaters would know. Perhaps the fact that you don't, and your boat was removed with one aren't entirely disconnected?
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on May 28, 2023 15:31:19 GMT
Yesterday and earlier today, Tony Dunkley said:
< Tonydtrent@gmail.com > or on 07903 063179 >
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on May 29, 2023 3:16:37 GMT
On several occasions over the last few days, Tony Dunkley said:
"C&RT(Ltd) didn't have a 'Section 8 Order' when it stole the first boat from George Ward on 19 April 2023, and then illegally evicted him from the second boat, on 11 May 2023, prior to stealing that too."
There's no such thing as a 'Section 8 Order', . . what this idiot actually means is the CPR Part 8 Declaration/Injunction Order that C&RT(Ltd) wilfully misled Bristol County Court into making on 23 January 2023, . . the same 'Court Order' that Matthew Aymes and Lucy Barry then lied to Wiltshire Police about to con them into getting involved in a wholly civil dispute ? If so, there's no point to make, . . the Order was void from the moment it was made -- same wording as the 15 August 2019 Halcyon Daze Order.
All perfectly normal standard procedure whenever C&RT(Ltd) and Commercial Boat Services carry out an illegal eviction and boat seizure under the pretence that the meaningless 10-minute rubber-stamping exercise Court Orders they fool the Police and usually everyone else with, give them the lawful power and authority to act in the manner of genuine Court certificated Enforcement Officers/Agents (Bailiffs) whilst supposedly 'enforcing' Section 8 of the British Waterways Act 1983. __________________________________________________________________________
The long running Section 8 boat seizing scam has finally been exposed, and should now be over and finished with for good, . . because ALL of C&RT(Ltd)'s Injunction and boat removal Declaration Orders - their much trumpeted and even more misused and abused "Court Orders" - are 'void' - ie. worthless - from the moment they're made by virtue of the stated effect of paragraph 1) in relation to the true position/situation in respect of the 'lawful authority' for 'relevant craft' to be kept or used on C&RT(Ltd) controlled PRN river waterways listed in Schedule 1 to the British Waterways Act 1971 (as amended).
The terms of the Injunctions - paras 2) and 3) of the Orders exceed the power and authority of both the Court and the C&RT(Ltd) with resect to the Public Right of Navigation in that the wording of paras 2) and 3) of the Orders forbids the ". . navigating, mooring, or securing of the [subject craft] on any part of the Claimant's waterways" -- phraseology that encompasses the PRN river waterways listed in Schedule 1 to the British Waterways Act 1971 (as amended).
No Court has the jurisdiction or power to reassign the effect of or amend statute, . . or to make an Order that has the effect of suspending, withdrawing, or extinguishing the extant Public Right of Navigation in respect of any particular named craft or vessel on any particular PRN waterway. Making an Order that purports to do so renders that Order void ab initio.
The process of seeking restitution for those who, over the whole period of its miserable existence, have lost their boats, homes and/or property to C&RT(Ltd)'s years of dishonesty and wilful deception must now begin. _______________________________________________________________________
Thank you to all those who've responded to the above via text or e-mail. What's needed now are more names and contact details for everyone or anyone who's had boat 'seized' by C&RT(Ltd) after being issued with a Section 8 Notice -- residential or otherwise, with or without one of the pointless/worthless Court Orders, . . and irrespective of whether or not the owner has signed the disclaimer form that C&RT(Ltd) usually try it on with.
If you've been a victim of this long running fraud, or know anyone who has, please contact me at :
< Tonydtrent@gmail.com > or on 07903 063179 >
. . . . or simply ignore the ill-intentioned, or the just plain vacuous, disrupters who are doing their best to finish the forum off and to get it closed down, . . join Thunderboat as a new active member, and have your say on here, on any subject you wish.
At one time, before it was hi-jacked by the idiotic and the mindless, Thunderboat had grown from its inauspicious beginnings into the livliest and most interesting boating forum on the internet, . . it could be so again, . . IF the site owner and/or the active membership took the necessary action to stamp out the constant trolling.
If any guests, or potential new members, have doubts about this, then please look back through some pages and threads from eighteen months to two years ago. Easily done by going back far enough through the 'Recently Updated Threads' pages.
|
|