|
Post by Murgatroyd on May 29, 2023 3:55:14 GMT
The process of seeking restitution for those who, over the whole period of its miserable existence, have lost their boats, homes and/or property to C&RT(Ltd)'s years of dishonesty and wilful deception must now begin.
Praise be. Long have we waited for this glorious day. Only now and at the end, when it is too late, do they realise the power etc etc
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on May 29, 2023 4:37:30 GMT
|
|
|
Post by kris on May 29, 2023 6:21:55 GMT
Dunkley your a liar and a cheat.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on May 29, 2023 6:26:49 GMT
< Tonydtrent@gmail.com > or on 07903 063179
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on May 29, 2023 7:44:32 GMT
|
|
|
Post by kris on May 29, 2023 7:44:52 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on May 29, 2023 16:56:22 GMT
On the "George Ward evicted Live" topic over on CWDF, I see that the subject of Byelaw 30 of the current General Canal Byelaws 1976 has been introduced into the already muddled, confused and very unfocused discussion about the ridiculous outcome of the clowns at C&RT(Ltd) taking around 11 years and wasting God knows how much dosh on NOT achieving ANYTHING with regards to the perceived, blown up out of all proportion, problem of an elderly disabled man with a couple of old boats.
What IS wrong with these people, . . it appears to have been accepted, without any sort of questioning or examination, . . that somehow Section 17 subsection 3) of the BW Act 1995 effectively put and end to any possibility of invoking or enforcing Byelaw 30. Not that Byelaw 30 had ANY relevance to the George Ward fiasco anyway.
|
|
|
Post by Murgatroyd on May 29, 2023 17:02:07 GMT
So why bother mentioning it then? Oh yes, it's because you are a daft old windbag. May the end come swiftly.
|
|
|
Post by Jim on May 29, 2023 17:05:08 GMT
On the " George Ward evicted Live" topic over on CWDF, I see that the subject of Byelaw 30 of the current General Canal Byelaws 1976 has been introduced into the already muddled, confused and very unfocused discussion about the ridiculous outcome of the clowns at C&RT(Ltd) taking around 11 years and wasting God knows how much dosh on NOT achieving ANYTHING with regards to the perceived, blown up out of all proportion, problem of an elderly disabled man with a couple of old boats. What IS wrong with these people, . . it appears to have been accepted, without any sort of questioning or examination, . . that somehow Section 17 subsection 3) of the BW Act 1995 effectively put and end to any possibility of invoking or enforcing Byelaw 30. Not that Byelaw 30 had ANY relevance to the George Ward fiasco anyway. Why not post there and educate them? Oh silly me, they banned you and all your spawned clones. You only have yourself to blame, if you had wound your neck in and posted your content with civility and consideration you would have had the opportunity.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on May 29, 2023 17:43:54 GMT
On the "George Ward evicted Live" topic over on CWDF, I see that the subject of Byelaw 30 of the current General Canal Byelaws 1976 has been introduced into the already muddled, confused and very unfocused discussion about the ridiculous outcome of the clowns at C&RT(Ltd) taking around 11 years and wasting God knows how much dosh on NOT achieving ANYTHING with regards to the perceived, blown up out of all proportion, problem of an elderly disabled man with a couple of old boats.
What IS wrong with these people, . . it appears to have been accepted, without any sort of questioning or examination, . . that somehow Section 17 subsection 3) of the BW Act 1995 effectively put and end to any possibility of invoking or enforcing Byelaw 30, . . or come to that, . . ANY other Byelaw. Not that Byelaw 30 had ANY relevance to the George Ward fiasco anyway.
|
|
|
Post by kris on May 29, 2023 20:08:47 GMT
Shame you can’t post on there isn’t it Troll.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on May 30, 2023 7:44:10 GMT
The long running C&RT(Ltd) Section 8 boat seizing scam has finally been exposed for the disgraceful dishonest sham it is, and always has been, . . and it should now be possible to finally put an end to it for good.
The reason for this is that all of C&RT(Ltd)'s Injunction and boat removal Declaration Orders - their much trumpeted and even more misused and abused "Court Orders" - are 'void' - ie. worthless - from the moment they're made by virtue of the stated effect of paragraph 1) in relation to the true position/situation in respect of the 'lawful authority' for 'relevant craft' to be kept or used on C&RT(Ltd) controlled PRN river waterways listed in Schedule 1 to the British Waterways Act 1971 (as amended).
In addition, the terms of the Injunctions - paras 2) and 3) of the Orders exceed the power and authority of both the Court and the C&RT(Ltd) with respect to the Public Right of Navigation in that the wording of paras 2) and 3) of the Orders forbids the ". . navigating, mooring, or securing of the [subject craft] on any part of the Claimant's waterways" -- phraseology that encompasses the PRN river waterways listed in Schedule 1 to the British Waterways Act 1971 (as amended).
No Court has the jurisdiction or power to reassign the effect of or amend statute, . . or to make an Order that has the effect of suspending, withdrawing, or extinguishing the extant Public Right of Navigation in respect of any particular named craft or vessel on any particular PRN waterway. Making an Order that purports to do so renders that Order void ab initio ie. from the very beginning - at the time it is made.
The process of seeking restitution for those who, over the whole period of its miserable existence, have lost their boats, homes and/or property to C&RT(Ltd)'s years of dishonesty and wilful deception must now begin. _______________________________________________________________________
Thank you to all those who've responded alredy via text or e-mail. What's needed now are more names and contact details for everyone or anyone who's had boat 'seized' by C&RT(Ltd) after being issued with a Section 8 Notice -- residential or otherwise, with or without one of the pointless/worthless Court Orders, . . and irrespective of whether or not the owner has signed the disclaimer form that C&RT(Ltd) usually try it on with.
If you've been a victim of this long running fraud, or know anyone who has, please contact me at :
< Tonydtrent@gmail.com > or on 07903 063179 >
. . . . or simply ignore the ill-intentioned thread disrupters who do their vacuous best every day to drive this forum into oblivion, . . join Thunderboat as a new active member, and have your say, . . about anything you want to, . . it's entirely your choice and entirely up to you.
At one time, before it was hi-jacked by the idiotic and the mindless, Thunderboat had grown from its inauspicious beginnings into the livliest and most interesting boating plus anything else you fancy forum on the internet, . . it used to be entertaining, informative and good fun, . . and could be so again.
If any guests, or perhaps anyone else thinking about becoming member, have doubts about joining in, then please look back through some pages and threads from eighteen months to two years ago, and see what's been lost. Easily done by going back far enough through the 'Recently Updated Threads' pages.
|
|
|
Post by on May 30, 2023 7:51:48 GMT
It will be interesting to see how and if the CRT respond to someone living in a tent on their land.
Good time of year for it. Come the autumn I think the fire in the boat will be missed.
|
|
|
Post by kris on May 30, 2023 8:04:39 GMT
It will be interesting to see how and if the CRT respond to someone living in a tent on their land. Good time of year for it. Come the autumn I think the fire in the boat will be missed. I wonder if it will become a thing.
|
|
|
Post by Murgatroyd on May 30, 2023 8:09:52 GMT
I knew I chap who voluntarily went from a boat to the crappiest bender I ever saw. He was only a murder away from diagnosis though. I sometimes wonder what became of him but it's just morbid fascination.
CRT won't mind if so long as it isn't covered in local press stories.
|
|