|
Post by β on Nov 2, 2023 12:34:16 GMT
Swimming lessons offered to the successful candidate.
I expect sooner or later the CRT will contract this job out.
Is one allowed to take one's swordcane?
|
|
|
Post by Andyberg on Nov 2, 2023 12:41:36 GMT
Enforcement needs toughening up thats for sure, contracted out to carpark type companies who will come down hard on the pisstakers... Pay up & move on or piss off could be their new motto! π
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Nov 2, 2023 12:54:34 GMT
This vacancy is advertised...where?
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Nov 2, 2023 12:55:42 GMT
Enforcement needs toughening up thats for sure, contracted out to carpark type companies who will come down hard on the pisstakers... Pay up & move on or piss off could be their new motto! π Perfect. You've got the job.
|
|
|
Post by β on Nov 2, 2023 13:10:11 GMT
This vacancy is advertised...where? CRT jobs google search
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Nov 2, 2023 13:15:26 GMT
This vacancy is advertised...where? CRT jobs google search Not on the CRT website though
|
|
|
Post by kris on Nov 2, 2023 13:17:07 GMT
Itβs the classic Iβm alright jack. Heβs got the money to keep paying what ever happens. Even if he has to weigh some of his stashed silver and gold in. Its not that at all. I'm just thinking of what the CRT could logically do to get more money. I know people just want to moan about the management but if there actually is a problem and canals are at risk of closure would it not make sense for people using canals to contribute more ? I think most boaters would be happy to pay more,if they thought it was getting spent on maintenance. The thing is any increase should be even across all boaters. Singling one section out for larger increases is discrimination.
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Nov 2, 2023 13:22:35 GMT
There are far too many overstaying pisstakers. This boat has been there for so long that the owners died and no-one noticed.
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Nov 2, 2023 13:25:50 GMT
Someone went to quite a lot of bother for that.
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Nov 2, 2023 13:35:09 GMT
Its not that at all. I'm just thinking of what the CRT could logically do to get more money. I know people just want to moan about the management but if there actually is a problem and canals are at risk of closure would it not make sense for people using canals to contribute more ? I think most boaters would be happy to pay more,if they thought it was getting spent on maintenance. The thing is any increase should be even across all boaters. Singling one section out for larger increases is discrimination. You are singling out some boaters to pay more, others less, as a total contribution to CRT. Make up your mind whether you want to treat everyone fairly or not.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Nov 2, 2023 13:53:42 GMT
I think most boaters would be happy to pay more,if they thought it was getting spent on maintenance. The thing is any increase should be even across all boaters. Singling one section out for larger increases is discrimination. You are singling out some boaters to pay more, others less, as a total contribution to CRT. Make up your mind whether you want to treat everyone fairly or not. Jim for the last time you pay extra for a mooring which you choose to not use. Thatβs your choice. You seem to enjoy being a continuous dumper. Which to my mind is more of a problem than people who actually use their boat as a home. So you could be said to be feckless.
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Nov 2, 2023 14:00:53 GMT
The other thing that is irrational of course, is to adjust licence fees only by length and not by beam. A 60β 14β wide boat should pay twice as much as a 60β narrowboat. This is what happens on EA waters, it is the area not the length that determines the licence fee.
|
|
|
Post by fi on Nov 2, 2023 14:06:55 GMT
What is the basis of the legal challenges? Please. CRT can only make charges that are specifically allowed under law. They cannot make up new charges. Itβs the old contrast between an individual and a pubic body. An individual can do anything unless it is disallowed in law. A public body can only do what is specifically allowed in law, it canβt do anything else. The law describes a licence and a fee. Note the βaβ which is singular. The law does not seem to allow for different scales of licences according to circumstance. Well that is my opinion, but of course only a court of law can rule authoritatively on such things. If CRT cannot make up new charges, then how can they charge extra for wide boats...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 2, 2023 14:07:36 GMT
But you get more Jim ... a mooring. Rog But he, and I, pay the mooring owner for the use of the mooring. And then we pay another 10% directly to CRT, which goes into the same pot as the licence fee. Approaching Β£300 in our case. So CRT gets directly from us, about 30% more than a CCer with the same sized boat. Yes we get a mooring too, but there is no escaping that having paid the marina operator their fee to cover expenditure and profit, we also have to give CRT another Β£300. No, the marina owner pays crt. Both your own and jims feckless babbling is crap.
|
|
|
Post by β on Nov 2, 2023 14:55:07 GMT
Not on the CRT website though Agency.
|
|