|
Post by kris on Mar 18, 2024 23:30:50 GMT
As I’ve said Tony supply the name of a police officer and a crime reference number and I’ll hand myself in.
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Mar 19, 2024 6:32:44 GMT
Is there anything in statute that says:
•Boats can be removed from the canal because they are unlicensed?
Yep.
•Boats without moorings must move a minimum and undisclosed distance every two weeks?
Nope.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Mar 19, 2024 7:05:05 GMT
If you do not wish your views to be replied to in the manner of the respondent's choosing then don't make them on a forum. To suggest that doing so constitutes some type of criminal offence simply flags up your ineffable and terminal stupidity. There is no Law which requires anybody to agree with the opinion of a gibbering cretin. Take this up with the Courts. Either shit or get off the pot.
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Mar 19, 2024 7:17:53 GMT
Gibbering cretin.
Has a fair ring to it.
🤣🤣🤣
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Mar 19, 2024 7:58:34 GMT
Tony's S8 had nothing to do with movement or distance. The Boat was unlicensed but did have a place where it could reasonably be kept ie a mooring. Let’s face it a lot of Tony’s case was a personal vendetta between Stuart garner and Tony. It’s not right that personality comes into these situations but it does. Mind you if Tony spoke to him like he speaks to people on here, you can kind of understand why mr garner took it personally. He retired not long after seizing halcyon daze.
My usual preference is not to reply to the made-up garbage posted by mindless turd kris, . . but this opportunity to say something that Parry and Deards internet snoopers will have go scuttling back to their bosses with is just too good to pass up :- Stuart Garner, . . former so-called C&RT Customer/Licence Support Officer, . . DID NOT retire following the episode when he was in overall charge of the Commercial Boat Services gang of operatives and phoney/bogus Bailiffs who unlawfully evicted me from and seized and towed away the boat I WAS living aboard, and WAS my sole residence, Halcyon Daze. He, Garner, now works for the EA, . . where he's been ever since his employment with C&RT was terminated.
He had to leave C&RT's employment due to becoming too much of a liability and embarrassment. His first major blunders were in putting his name, . . along with that of a senior member of Parry's management 'team', . . to a number of letters and e-mails, clearly stating, amongst other ill-considered admissions and/or claims, that the forcible eviction from, and seizure of Halcyon Daze was "ordered" by, and lawfully executed with the full authority of the Court.
Then, only days prior to the senior member of Parry's management 'team', the one mentioned above, writing to me to inform me that Halcyon Daze had been sold by C&RT contractors, Commercial Boat Services [CBS], . . little turd Garner really excelled himself by sending me a 'Disclaimer Form', . . inviting me to sign over ownership of Halcyon Daze to the C&RT.
What really, and finally I think, brought Garner's glittering career with C&RT to an end was when he was interviewed by the Police (I have the transcript of the interview) and claimed during the interview that he was an Enforcement Officer, authorised by and acting on behalf of the Court to take control of goods (ie. 'seize' them) under Schedule 12, and Sections 62, 63, and 64 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007. He isn't, . . and never has been, . . nor ever will be !
In addition, Garner also stated (lied) to the Police, that although the two CBS supplied 'enforcement officers' (bogus Bailiffs) did not hold Court issued certificates authorising them to act as such themselves, . . they were acting in his presence and under his direction [S.63(2)(c) TCE Act 2007] as the holder of a Court issued authorisation certificate [S.63(2)(a) TCE Act 2007], and therefore acting correctly and lawfully, . . when, because he wouldn't get off my boat when I told him to, . . I assaulted one of them and slung him off.
There's plenty more, . . but that's all that Parry and Deards internet snoopers are getting for now.
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Mar 19, 2024 8:26:11 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Mar 19, 2024 8:40:00 GMT
Let’s face it a lot of Tony’s case was a personal vendetta between Stuart garner and Tony. It’s not right that personality comes into these situations but it does. Mind you if Tony spoke to him like he speaks to people on here, you can kind of understand why mr garner took it personally. He retired not long after seizing halcyon daze.
My usual preference is not to reply to the made-up garbage posted by mindless turd kris, . . but this opportunity to say something that Parry and Deards internet snoopers will have go scuttling back to their bosses with is just too good to pass up :-
, . . but that's all that Parry and Deards internet snoopers are getting for now. Prime entertainment value over the coffee break at CRT office. Coffee will be spraying everywhere. You claim you have lots of followers who only come here for your words of wisdom, go and set up your own forum then they wont be subject to the posts of us retards. CRT will follow you, just email parry with your new forum address. Your servile brown nosed mate GHL can inform CWDF, maybe with a personal special invite to Rachel.
|
|
|
Post by on Mar 19, 2024 9:16:13 GMT
The CBS and CRT guys are quacking in their boots.
|
|
|
Post by dogless on Mar 19, 2024 9:20:09 GMT
|
|
|
Post by kris on Mar 19, 2024 9:56:13 GMT
Let’s face it a lot of Tony’s case was a personal vendetta between Stuart garner and Tony. It’s not right that personality comes into these situations but it does. Mind you if Tony spoke to him like he speaks to people on here, you can kind of understand why mr garner took it personally. He retired not long after seizing halcyon daze.
My usual preference is not to reply There's plenty more, . . but that's all that Parry and Deards internet snoopers are getting for now. With so much overwhelming evidence, it makes you wonder why the police never prosecuted. Especially since you have admitted assaulting one of the bailiffs.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Mar 19, 2024 10:35:35 GMT
My usual preference is not to reply There's plenty more, . . but that's all that Parry and Deards internet snoopers are getting for now. With so much overwhelming evidence, it makes you wonder why the police never prosecuted. Especially since you have admitted assaulting one of the bailiffs. I didn't assault a 'Bailiff', . . idiot, . . I assaulted one of the CBS/C&RT contracted turds who were impersonating Bailiffs, . . and who had no lawful right or authority, whatsoever, to board my boat, . . or to attempt to evict me from it, . . or to seize it and take it away to be craned out of the river, and transported to CBS MD, Brian Clarke's farm just outside Chester.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Mar 19, 2024 10:39:36 GMT
But you admit the assault, so I’m surprised they never prosecuted you. Maybe you should have assaulted a few more of them. Then at least you would have had your day in court and got your case infront of a judge.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Mar 19, 2024 11:26:16 GMT
But you admit the assault, so I’m surprised they never prosecuted you. Maybe you should have assaulted a few more of them. Then at least you would have had your day in court and got your case infront of a judge. The Police didn't prosecute me for assault, . . or take any other action against me, . . because Garner and the bogus Bailiff insisted that they didn't. Are you, or any of the other members of the Thunderboat Brains Trust, bright enough to figure out why ?
|
|
|
Post by kris on Mar 19, 2024 11:27:42 GMT
Yes yes Tony all well and good. But when are you taking them to court, to right the wrongs they have done to you?
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Mar 19, 2024 11:32:13 GMT
But you admit the assault, so I’m surprised they never prosecuted you. Maybe you should have assaulted a few more of them. Then at least you would have had your day in court and got your case infront of a judge. The Police didn't prosecute me for assault, . . or take any other action against me, . . because Garner and the bogus Bailiff insisted that they didn't. Are you, or any of the other members of the Thunderboat Brains Trust, bright enough to figure out why ? They weren't that bothered by a frail little old man, just wanted to make sure you kept the peace.
|
|