|
Post by kris on Dec 7, 2021 18:45:51 GMT
Get back under your bridge, I was talking about you not to you.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Dec 7, 2021 18:49:20 GMT
Get back under your bridge, I was talking about you not to you. If you know the owner or owners of either 'Mersey' or 'Wye', . . why don't you do something useful for a change and pass on my contact details to them ?
|
|
|
Post by kris on Dec 7, 2021 18:51:05 GMT
Get back under your bridge, I was talking about you not to you. If you know the owner or owners of either 'Mersey' or 'Wye', . . why don't you do something useful for a change and pass on my contact details to them ? How would passing on the details of a demented old fool be of use?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2021 18:53:14 GMT
FFS
|
|
|
Post by kris on Dec 7, 2021 18:54:11 GMT
|
|
|
Post by kris on Dec 7, 2021 18:58:47 GMT
Anyway Tony how’s your caravan? Is it cosy? It’s your second winter in it, so it must be comfortable by now?
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Dec 7, 2021 18:59:37 GMT
If you know the owner or owners of either 'Mersey' or 'Wye', . . why don't you do something useful for a change and pass on my contact details to them ? How would passing on the details of a demented old fool be of use? Copied and recorded for file.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Dec 7, 2021 19:02:11 GMT
How would passing on the details of a demented old fool be of use? Copied and recorded for file. Tony your a twat, that’s my opinion and I’m allowed to express it, so put that in your file.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Dec 7, 2021 19:07:20 GMT
Copied and recorded for file. Tony your a twat, that’s my opinion and I’m allowed to express it, so put that in your file. Opinions are of no interest, . . defamatory/libellous statements are !
|
|
|
Post by kris on Dec 7, 2021 19:10:01 GMT
Tony your a twat, that’s my opinion and I’m allowed to express it, so put that in your file. Opinions are of no interest, . . defamatory/libellous statements are ! In my opinion your a demented old fool. If you hadn’t been so tight as to not spend £130 on a safety cert, you would still have your boat. Explain how that isn’t the action of a fool?
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Dec 7, 2021 19:16:28 GMT
Opinions are of no interest, . . defamatory/libellous statements are ! If you hadn’t been so tight as to not spend £130 on a safety cert, you would still have your boat. Explain how that isn’t the action of a fool? Repeating defamatory statements on the internet is just a libellous as originating and publishing them !
|
|
|
Post by kris on Dec 7, 2021 19:28:28 GMT
If you hadn’t been so tight as to not spend £130 on a safety cert, you would still have your boat. Explain how that isn’t the action of a fool? Repeating defamatory statements on the internet is just a libellous as originating and publishing them ! If the statement is true it isn’t defamatory, it’s a statement of fact. So would you like to answer the question and explain how your actions weren’t the actions of a fool?
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Dec 7, 2021 19:41:05 GMT
Unless of course he’s another Dunkley? If he is, . . and the boats were taken by C&RT under its S.8 powers from that private wharf -- which I believe is one of those along, I think, Mill Lane, . . he'll be aware they've both been taken illegally. Are you going to advise him, as his legal team? It may have been non payment of licence rather than mooring fee, they would have been floating wholely on CRT water.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Dec 7, 2021 19:44:38 GMT
Repeating defamatory statements on the internet is just a libellous as originating and publishing them ! If the statement is true it isn’t defamatory, it’s a statement of fact. So would you like to answer the question and explain how your actions weren’t the actions of a fool? I thought not. So you just scuttle off under your bridge like a good little troll.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Dec 7, 2021 20:30:33 GMT
Repeating defamatory statements on the internet is just a libellous as originating and publishing them ! If the statement is true it isn’t defamatory, it’s a statement of fact. So would you like to answer the question and explain how your actions weren’t the actions of a fool? You would do well to get someone with a considerably higher IQ, and a much better grasp of the English language, to educate you in how to differentiate conjecture inspired by malice and stupidity and misrepresented as 'fact', . . from matters, or statements, of demonstrable truth and fact.
|
|