|
Post by Mr Stabby on Apr 4, 2017 21:31:20 GMT
As I've said all along, having a passport issued by a certain country does not mean a person respects the values or people of that country.
|
|
|
Post by Delta9 on Apr 4, 2017 21:34:43 GMT
As I've said all along, having a passport issued by a certain country does not mean a person respects the values or people of that country. Has anyone ever disagreed with that?
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Apr 4, 2017 21:37:15 GMT
As I've said all along, having a passport issued by a certain country does not mean a person respects the values or people of that country. Has anyone ever disagreed with that? Yes, that's why most of your members were banned from CWDF.
|
|
|
Post by Delta9 on Apr 4, 2017 21:55:48 GMT
Has anyone ever disagreed with that? Yes, that's why most of your members were banned from CWDF. I've never seen anyone claim that having a passport means that the holder respects the values or people of the country. Are you sure this actually happened and wasn't a special brew induced figment of your imagination? Can you provide a link?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2017 9:26:32 GMT
All Trump innit. CIA setting up "terrorist training camps" pretending to be muslim fundamentalists. They find people who are pissed off to go and do attacks.
Everyone thinks its a muslim thing. It isn't its an arrangement designed to increase the approval rating for the US president and his aggressive policies.
|
|
|
Post by bodger on Apr 5, 2017 12:26:41 GMT
here we go again...................... a nutter sets off a bomb and the world immediately says 'IS terrorist'.
shut the fuck up, don't even mention their name (if you must do then only use the correct description which is Daesh), and recognise the man only as a deluded violent criminal. NO credit at all to any organisation. Starve the bastards of any publicity.
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Apr 5, 2017 14:13:36 GMT
They are all 'lone wolves' and they all have 'mental issues'. There were a lot of lone wolves with mental issues dancing in the streets and cheering as people jumped from the burning World Trade Centre towers in New York on 11th September 2001.
|
|
|
Post by Clinton Cool on Apr 5, 2017 15:46:19 GMT
Over the years there have been a number of similar attacks carried out by various people. None of these people have been called 'John Smith' or another common English name. Come to think of it, each and every one of them has had a central/ south Asian or north African name. Also brownish skin. Also a beard. And they have all been Muslims.
What can we deduce? Well, people with brownish skin, beards, and follow Islam, are disproportionately likely to suffer from mental problems so serious, that they could go out and commit mass murder.
This being the case, perhaps the NHS should have a rethink. Particularly, as there appears to be a public clamour for more spending on mental health issues. Rather than concentrating on survival rates for cancer they could instead divert these funds to a large new pot. Let's call it: Scheme for the prevention of mental disorder related mass murders. Hell, they could even delay hip and knee replacement further, let's say 5 years waiting, even more funds for mental issues.
The beauty of this scheme is that it could replace the hated PREVENT scheme. Hated because it's racist in that it concentrates all its efforts on the only group of people that are likely to carry out such crimes.
|
|
|
Post by Delta9 on Apr 5, 2017 16:16:20 GMT
Over the years there have been a number of similar attacks carried out by various people. None of these people have been called 'John Smith' or another common English name. Come to think of it, each and every one of them has had a central/ south Asian or north African name. Also brownish skin. Also a beard. And they have all been Muslims. What fucking planet do yo live on?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2017 16:31:50 GMT
Over the years there have been a number of similar attacks carried out by various people. None of these people have been called 'John Smith' or another common English name. Come to think of it, each and every one of them has had a central/ south Asian or north African name. Also brownish skin. Also a beard. And they have all been Muslims. What fucking planet do yo live on? Yes, some people would disagree with Ricco's description of a stereotypical terrorist... www.google.co.uk/amp/www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/06/iraq-war-relative-tony-blair-is-worlds-worst-terrorist/amp/
|
|
|
Post by Clinton Cool on Apr 5, 2017 16:47:40 GMT
Tony Blair is a deluded individual with an ego to match. Perhaps the latter led to the former. He made a terrible decision that led to the death of hundreds of thousands of people. It's important to note though, that he didn't intend that his decision would bring this result.
I detest Blair, I think it would be reasonable for him to be tried in a court of law for his mistakes. Being the leader of a country carries this responsibility, it would be reasonable. To suggest he's a terrorist is going too far though, this crime requires intent.
|
|
|
Post by bodger on Apr 5, 2017 17:10:44 GMT
but I would be surprised to hear that that fundamental creationist christian thicko otherwise known as Dubya (Blair's idol) did NOT intend to kill millions of Muslims.
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Apr 6, 2017 7:31:21 GMT
Tony Blair is a deluded individual with an ego to match. " Tony Blair said 'bad stuff' from his days in student band Ugly Rumours would have killed his political career if it had been posted on social media (pictured, Blair makes a rude hand gesture as a 21-year-old) "
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2017 7:55:44 GMT
Tony Blair is a deluded individual with an ego to match. Perhaps the latter led to the former. He made a terrible decision that led to the death of hundreds of thousands of people. It's important to note though, that he didn't intend that his decision would bring this result. I detest Blair, I think it would be reasonable for him to be tried in a court of law for his mistakes. Being the leader of a country carries this responsibility, it would be reasonable. To suggest he's a terrorist is going too far though, this crime requires intent. I think you are right about the intent thing Ricco but those in power ovwr the ages must have known if their decisions would be responsible for many deaths. Is it only those who have been brainwashed or ordered to kill who should be held responsible for 'terrorism'? As I've said before, ultimately you could argue we are all partially responsible as we vote in our leaders and pay taxes which can be misused on arming certain countries. As much as these attacks are aweful, I find it very curious that the media make such a huge thing abiut it compared with the millions of people who are allowed to starve each year. 3 million children, surely that's worse. It's a very strange world isn't it?
|
|
|
Post by bodger on Apr 6, 2017 8:33:59 GMT
starving children are unfortunately the result of the human race over-reaching its potential in certain parts of the world.
there is a blame there - the religions that encourage rampant breeding and the international organisations who spout hot air and send funds that are misdirected by corruption.
|
|