|
Post by bodger on Jun 9, 2017 20:14:36 GMT
So let's have a 2nd referendum when we know what we are heading for. right. so the UK team sit down to negotiate with their EU counterparts for 2 years, both parties fully aware that what they are talking about is purely hypothetical because when the new treaty is all ready to go, the British people will have the chance to throw it in the bin. a great way for the negotiations to be hard-headed and serious .............. not. and how exactly do we cancel the Article 50 notification?
|
|
|
Post by tonyqj on Jun 9, 2017 20:33:14 GMT
There was no chance of Corbyn getting in and the Forex traders knew that. They were reacting to the uncertainty of Mrs May's party. Corbyn could well be elected PM in 2017's second General Election. That's an interesting perspective. I've been pondering the issue and have so far settled on bugger all. The result could be identical or it could be a landslide in either direction. Yeah, really decisive huh? I don't think we can get an inkling of how it would play out until the manifestos and campaigning start. You'd think that the Tories couldn't possibly bungle another campaign as badly as they screwed up this one, but...
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Jun 9, 2017 20:41:16 GMT
One thing is for sure, Theresa May has made a complete and total cunt of herself throwing away millions of pounds of taxpayers' money on an election in order to go from having a working majority to having to grub around sucking up to Irish terrorists in one last desperate attempt to cling to power.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Jun 9, 2017 20:43:18 GMT
|
|
|
Post by lollygagger on Jun 9, 2017 20:43:20 GMT
One thing is for sure, Theresa May has made a complete and total cunt of herself throwing away millions of pounds of taxpayers' money on an election in order to go from having a working majority to having to grub around sucking up to Irish terrorists in one last desperate attempt to cling to power. There no depths to deep for a politician to sink to.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2017 0:18:51 GMT
One thing is for sure, Theresa May has made a complete and total cunt of herself throwing away millions of pounds of taxpayers' money on an election in order to go from having a working majority to having to grub around sucking up to Irish terrorists in one last desperate attempt to cling to power. CRT management seem to be playing the same game. 1) Create a problem which doesn't exist to justify ones existence and to push a personal agenda. 2) Spend a lot of the customers/victims money to start a debate and poll on the imaginary problem. 3) Force through the real agenda regardless of any moral response or vote. I guess they all go to same school of piss taking.
|
|
|
Post by patty on Jun 10, 2017 5:36:44 GMT
Perhaps this result is an indication of the way politics will now play out...no overwhelming majorities forcing parties to jump into bed with strange allies.....in everyones past stir deeply enough there is muck to be found...one thing for sure it'll all come out in the wash...no secrets once the bloodhounds of our press start tracking... as fot Brexit negotiations they will start as stated and we will all read whatever into whatever....
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Jun 10, 2017 6:37:44 GMT
So no real explanation beyond yourselves reiterating the squaukus may parrot shriek "Brexit means Brexit". The Tartan Trousered Parrot has shit on all our backs. It's just possible that it's this disdainful arrogant "I know but I'm not going to tell, trust me" that has led to this debacle. The Tories have led us into two unnessesary elections, trying to grasp more power and control, and then lost them both. Ffs. Utter incompetence. Little England is the butt of derision and laughter. I could go on but my morning brew is ready.
|
|
|
Post by JohnV on Jun 10, 2017 7:58:36 GMT
So no real explanation beyond yourselves reiterating the squaukus may parrot shriek "Brexit means Brexit". The Tartan Trousered Parrot has shit on all our backs. It's just possible that it's this disdainful arrogant "I know but I'm not going to tell, trust me" that has led to this debacle. The Tories have led us into two unnessesary elections, trying to grasp more power and control, and then lost them both. Ffs. Utter incompetence. Little England is the butt of derision and laughter. I could go on but my morning brew is ready. As you seem to be unable to grasp the very clear posts answering your question. Try this "I want a divorce" ......... "Ok afterwards we will have to agree on a financial settlement and access rights" We are saying "fine .... start the process (article 50) let's now start discussing and try and come to a fair settlement" (basically normal behaviour) You are saying "Why can't you tell me what the settlement is going to be before we negotiate" WTF don't you understand, can't you see how ridiculous the second position is ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2017 8:19:07 GMT
The whole brexit issue should be run by a cross party committee in my view. It should not even be on an election manifesto.
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Jun 10, 2017 8:45:13 GMT
I have told you May is an old lying hag. Time, methinks, to send the RAF to Berlin and demolish Merkel's house.
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Jun 10, 2017 8:54:22 GMT
A view of Tezzers new bessie mates
"What has been the price of the dirty deal reached earlier today? In the words of the respected British journalist Jon Snow, May has made an agreement with “One of the most extreme political entities in the British Isles” and few would disagree with that.
The DUP is UKIP or the BNP taken to the nth degree. It is a party of the European far right, a grouping in the mode of Marine Le Pen’s Front national or Frauke Petry’s Alternative für Deutschland. However, unlike the political establishments of France and Germany, in Britain the ultra-nationalists are to be given access to the levers of power by the mainstream, albeit at one remove. The xenophobia, hibernophobia and homophobia of Democratic Unionism has now received a form of tacit endorsement from the Conservative Party, a wink-and-a-nod acknowledgement which will give 17th century Protestant fundamentalism a platform to preach its archaic world-view in the 21st century. From opposing civil rights to denying climate change, the creationist-believing Ulster Trumps have been offered a warm welcome in Downing Street."
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Jun 10, 2017 9:01:06 GMT
So no real explanation beyond yourselves reiterating the squaukus may parrot shriek "Brexit means Brexit". The Tartan Trousered Parrot has shit on all our backs. It's just possible that it's this disdainful arrogant "I know but I'm not going to tell, trust me" that has led to this debacle. The Tories have led us into two unnessesary elections, trying to grasp more power and control, and then lost them both. Ffs. Utter incompetence. Little England is the butt of derision and laughter. I could go on but my morning brew is ready. As you seem to be unable to grasp the very clear posts answering your question. Try this "I want a divorce" ......... "Ok afterwards we will have to agree on a financial settlement and access rights" We are saying "fine .... start the process (article 50) let's now start discussing and try and come to a fair settlement" (basically normal behaviour) You are saying "Why can't you tell me what the settlement is going to be before we negotiate" WTF don't you understand, can't you see how ridiculous the second position is ? Wtf is wrong with asking what you wish to achieve through negotiation, not what the settlement will be. To much trust in Mrs weakanwobbly. See where she has got us today. In bed with INLA terrorists. (To use the rational thrown at Jeremy)
|
|
|
Post by kris on Jun 10, 2017 9:12:27 GMT
As you seem to be unable to grasp the very clear posts answering your question. Try this "I want a divorce" ......... "Ok afterwards we will have to agree on a financial settlement and access rights" We are saying "fine .... start the process (article 50) let's now start discussing and try and come to a fair settlement" (basically normal behaviour) You are saying "Why can't you tell me what the settlement is going to be before we negotiate" WTF don't you understand, can't you see how ridiculous the second position is ? Wtf is wrong with asking what you wish to achieve through negotiation, not what the settlement will be. To much trust in Mrs weakanwobbly. See where she has got us today. In bed with INLA terrorists. (To use the rational thrown at Jeremy) i would suggest it's the way that you dismiss what people say that grates, when they have taken the time and trouble to reply to you. As for the pm making deals with terrorists. You know what they say, one persons terrorist is another's parlimentary majority.
|
|
|
Post by peterboat on Jun 10, 2017 10:19:36 GMT
So no real explanation beyond yourselves reiterating the squaukus may parrot shriek "Brexit means Brexit". The Tartan Trousered Parrot has shit on all our backs. It's just possible that it's this disdainful arrogant "I know but I'm not going to tell, trust me" that has led to this debacle. The Tories have led us into two unnessesary elections, trying to grasp more power and control, and then lost them both. Ffs. Utter incompetence. Little England is the butt of derision and laughter. I could go on but my morning brew is ready. As you seem to be unable to grasp the very clear posts answering your question. Try this "I want a divorce" ......... "Ok afterwards we will have to agree on a financial settlement and access rights" We are saying "fine .... start the process (article 50) let's now start discussing and try and come to a fair settlement" (basically normal behaviour) You are saying "Why can't you tell me what the settlement is going to be before we negotiate" WTF don't you understand, can't you see how ridiculous the second position is ? John stop talking sense to the muppets, on the other channel its even better the lefties are ripping themselves to pieces shame it doesnt happen in real life!
|
|