|
Post by Graham on Oct 3, 2017 13:32:39 GMT
That is a flagrant untruth ...... You really can be an objectionable person ...... incidentally how many warnings have you had on CWDF ? ..... I never had any Oh - why were you banned from CWDF then? I've never had any warnings, but one short ban when I kept telling Dan that his forum was going down the pan and it was his fault. Nick everything is always someone else's fault it is never yours. You were banned because you posted, note you posted not Dan, in a way that broke the rules. There were warning posts even if you did not get a personalised direct warning.
|
|
|
Post by Clinton Cool on Oct 3, 2017 13:38:32 GMT
It doesn't really matter whether it was 90% or just over half. If it was 52% to end the Castillian sequestration of their historical and currently earned wealth then that's enough. That's how referendums work, winner takes all.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 3, 2017 13:40:39 GMT
Sulky sulky! You were the one who first descended into rudeness whilst I was merely trying to make the point that the 90% figure was meaningless. I'm sure you don't realise you were rude, because it's your normal MO when someone has a different opinion from you -which is why you were banned from CWDF. You know nick you really learn to stop when you are wrong. Put simply of those that managed to vote 90% voted for independence. With the input of the spanish government over 750,000 votes were ceased and not counted, polling stations forcibly closed etc. But whatever you like to say or twist 90% of those that voted voted for independence. Now go back in your cage. Just to add a couple more figures. I've done a trawl through the UK and Spanish media and the consensus is 2.3m votes were cast which equates to 43% of eligible voters and of those 90% were in favour of independence.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 3, 2017 14:26:15 GMT
If Catalonia became independent, would they have their own national airline? Slovakia doesn't have one of their own - Vienna is the airport Slovaks have to use. Czechoslovakia has to be one of the best models for peaceful separation of a country I've ever seen.
|
|
|
Post by Clinton Cool on Oct 3, 2017 15:39:32 GMT
I think the government of this country should make a special concession to Catholics in Northern Ireland (they are poor innit); double their child tax credits, create an instant Catholic baby boom. At the same time create special legislation for the province whereby parents are able to vote on behalf of their children, regardless of their age. 12 months hence, organise a referendum as to whether NI should remain as part of the uK or leave, and join their bothers in Eire. The result is obvious. Not only would this solve the EU border issue it would also return tons of taxpayers' money that's used to prop up this failed province. While the goverment is at it, it could organise a further Scottish election, all parties agreeing to promote a 'leave' vote. We could then rid ourselves of 2 leeches whilst simultaniously easing the path towards a nice and clean Brexit, to squash the third leech.
|
|
|
Post by peterboat on Oct 3, 2017 16:25:14 GMT
I think the government of this country should make a special concession to Catholics in Northern Ireland (they are poor innit); double their child tax credits, create an instant Catholic baby boom. At the same time create special legislation for the province whereby parents are able to vote on behalf of their children, regardless of their age. 12 months hence, organise a referendum as to whether NI should remain as part of the uK or leave, and join their bothers in Eire. The result is obvious. Not only would this solve the EU border issue it would also return tons of taxpayers' money that's used to prop up this failed province. While the goverment is at it, it could organise a further Scottish election, all parties agreeing to promote a 'leave' vote. We could then rid ourselves of 2 leeches whilst simultaniously easing the path towards a nice and clean Brexit, to squash the third leech. Ricco I have had a shit day [removing the shit tank out of the bathtub and ^^^^^^this brought a smile to my face thankyou
|
|
|
Post by Graham on Oct 3, 2017 16:25:44 GMT
I think the government of this country should make a special concession to Catholics in Northern Ireland (they are poor innit); double their child tax credits, create an instant Catholic baby boom. At the same time create special legislation for the province whereby parents are able to vote on behalf of their children, regardless of their age. 12 months hence, organise a referendum as to whether NI should remain as part of the uK or leave, and join their bothers in Eire. The result is obvious. Not only would this solve the EU border issue it would also return tons of taxpayers' money that's used to prop up this failed province. While the goverment is at it, it could organise a further Scottish election, all parties agreeing to promote a 'leave' vote. We could then rid ourselves of 2 leeches whilst simultaniously easing the path towards a nice and clean Brexit, to squash the third leech. Oh ricco that is not fair, anyone would get the idea you wished them gone. might not be a bad idea, them being gone
|
|
|
Post by Graham on Oct 3, 2017 16:28:59 GMT
A drop of salt is better for leechs. Flicking off with a card can leave the jaws in the wound. Salt also acts as a disinfectant for any germs on the skin etc.
|
|
|
Post by phil70 on Oct 3, 2017 16:57:05 GMT
Sulky sulky! You were the one who first descended into rudeness whilst I was merely trying to make the point that the 90% figure was meaningless. I'm sure you don't realise you were rude, because it's your normal MO when someone has a different opinion from you -which is why you were banned from CWDF. As always Nick you assume you know something I know why John was banned, but then again I was following the banter between him a Phil when it happened True, and to this day I don't understand why I only got 2 warning points while John got the big Finito Benito, ridiculous really because we were only having a larf Phil
|
|
|
Post by Clinton Cool on Oct 3, 2017 17:26:52 GMT
Another idea for Scotland: Draft legislation to end the Barnett formula, which is grossly unfair to the English. Give the weasel Merkel look alike Sturgeon her precious referendum, and let the jocks try to stand on their own two feet. Lance the boil!
|
|
|
Post by Graham on Oct 3, 2017 19:11:11 GMT
"A drop of salt is better for leechs. Flicking off with a card can leave the jaws in the wound. Salt also acts as a disinfectant for any germs on the skin etc." Then perhaps England is lucky in having Cheshire on the Welsh border, with all its salt mines! Could be After being in leech country on the coast we used to go for a walk in the sea. By the time we took out boots off the leeches were very happy to depart
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Oct 3, 2017 19:12:42 GMT
Exactly the same reason as you were banned ..... for "Fomenting dissent" only my ban was by Bones and was an instant lifetime ban ... I never appealed as I consider arguing against what has proved to be a very bad regime was correct and I have no desire to have anything to do with such a group as long as it is in the hands of an "owner" who is more concerned about how it reflects his own CV and political views than that of the membership But you forget, you were banned during the "mass cull", I was not. I was banned some time later for, amongst other things, pointing out that your banning was unreasonable. No, please, there is no need to thank me for fighting your corner for you.
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Oct 3, 2017 19:13:39 GMT
Sulky sulky! You were the one who first descended into rudeness whilst I was merely trying to make the point that the 90% figure was meaningless. I'm sure you don't realise you were rude, because it's your normal MO when someone has a different opinion from you -which is why you were banned from CWDF. If that were the case then it's a bloody mystery as to why you have never been permanently banned from there.... Probably because I am capable of stringing an argument together without resorting to insults as the first step.
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Oct 3, 2017 19:15:54 GMT
Sulky sulky! You were the one who first descended into rudeness whilst I was merely trying to make the point that the 90% figure was meaningless. I'm sure you don't realise you were rude, because it's your normal MO when someone has a different opinion from you -which is why you were banned from CWDF. As always Nick you assume you know something I know why John was banned, but then again I was following the banter between him a Phil when it happened You don't know why John was banned. You may have been viewing some "final straw" thread, but behind that were a multiplicity of ill tempered posts attacking anyone who had a different viewpoint from him. Just like in this thread.
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Oct 3, 2017 19:17:38 GMT
Sulky sulky! You were the one who first descended into rudeness whilst I was merely trying to make the point that the 90% figure was meaningless. I'm sure you don't realise you were rude, because it's your normal MO when someone has a different opinion from you -which is why you were banned from CWDF. You know nick you really learn to stop when you are wrong. Put simply of those that managed to vote 90% voted for independence. With the input of the spanish government over 750,000 votes were ceased and not counted, polling stations forcibly closed etc. But whatever you like to say or twist 90% of those that voted voted for independence. Now go back in your cage. How do you know 90% of voters who voted said yes? Because the people organising it with a view to getting that result, said so! How gullible! I thought you were a lawyer? Do you always believe what someone with a vested interest says?
|
|