|
|
Post by Andyberg on Jan 4, 2018 23:54:20 GMT
Attacked and raped over 100 women and serves 10yrs? Up for release? Justice really is shit! Anyone supporting this & saying he has done his time need to let him baby sit their kids or drive their wife home after a night out! www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-42571219 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2018 0:30:54 GMT
The problem we have is that we cannot afford the amount of prison space needed to keep people who deserve to be locked up in there for as long as they should be.
So some get released before really they should be.
It's a question of economics really.
|
|
|
|
Post by patty on Jan 5, 2018 7:08:28 GMT
Chemical castration.....
|
|
|
|
Post by peterboat on Jan 5, 2018 8:46:34 GMT
Or done with a rusty knife......................
|
|
|
|
Post by bodger on Jan 5, 2018 8:56:27 GMT
I know of a bloke who groomed a willing 15yr old who pretended to be 19 and received an indefinite (IPP) sentence and has been incarcerated for 9 years already. Quite out of proportion. What with legal fees and the like he must have cost the country at least half a million to date. That means that the income tax from maybe 10 average workers has gone just to keep him inside.
|
|
|
|
Post by alex on Jan 5, 2018 17:01:01 GMT
Maybe we could afford to keep them in jail if tax was collected fairly from all sections of society.
|
|
|
|
Post by flatdog on Jan 5, 2018 18:00:05 GMT
Listening to the radio as i was driving around today, apparently his sentence was derived from drugging about 20 women and raping 1. That is what he was found guilty of.
The outstanding 100 or so is a low estimate apparently - but no evidence no case.
Plus the twat will end up with a new identity etc etc.
Also heard the release committe head has been summonsed to Downing street to explain their decision so it may not be that simple.
How on earth can a rapist attacking up to 3 women a night suddently change his ways in that short space of time. He must be an extremely devious fukcer.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2018 23:00:29 GMT
Gender neutral the bastard.
|
|
|
|
Post by thebfg on Jan 5, 2018 23:16:34 GMT
Listening to the radio as i was driving around today, apparently his sentence was derived from drugging about 20 women and raping 1. That is what he was found guilty of. The outstanding 100 or so is a low estimate apparently - but no evidence no case. Plus the twat will end up with a new identity etc etc. Also heard the release committe head has been summonsed to Downing street to explain their decision so it may not be that simple. How on earth can a rapist attacking up to 3 women a night suddently change his ways in that short space of time. He must be an extremely devious fukcer. How is it the parole boards fault when they are just following rules. To be fair the bbc article does not say his exact sentence but does state he was ordered to serve at least 8 years which he has done. Is the parole board not forced to then release him on licence. |
|
|
|
Post by Graham on Jan 5, 2018 23:23:27 GMT
Listening to the radio as i was driving around today, apparently his sentence was derived from drugging about 20 women and raping 1. That is what he was found guilty of. The outstanding 100 or so is a low estimate apparently - but no evidence no case. Plus the twat will end up with a new identity etc etc. Also heard the release committe head has been summonsed to Downing street to explain their decision so it may not be that simple. How on earth can a rapist attacking up to 3 women a night suddently change his ways in that short space of time. He must be an extremely devious fukcer. How is it the parole boards fault when they are just following rules. To be fair the bbc article does not say his exact sentence but does state he was ordered to serve at least 8 years which he has done. Is the parole board not forced to then release him on licence. I think the Parole Board followed the rules to the letter. I also think they are getting fed up with getting blamed when people object to someone being released. From an interview with the Head of the Parole Board he wants things opened up. Apparently they are not permitted to release their reasons for the release. |
|
|
|
Post by tomsk on Jan 6, 2018 1:40:10 GMT
How is it the parole boards fault when they are just following rules. To be fair the bbc article does not say his exact sentence but does state he was ordered to serve at least 8 years which he has done. Is the parole board not forced to then release him on licence. I think the Parole Board followed the rules to the letter. I also think they are getting fed up with getting blamed when people object to someone being released. From an interview with the Head of the Parole Board he wants things opened up. Apparently they are not permitted to release their reasons for the release. I think you're right. As I understand it the sentence handed down was +- par for the era and not formally challenged with regard to it's leniency at the time but had been reviewed. It stinks, but I think the Boards hand were tied. |
|
|
|
Post by thebfg on Jan 6, 2018 8:13:49 GMT
I think the Parole Board followed the rules to the letter. I also think they are getting fed up with getting blamed when people object to someone being released. From an interview with the Head of the Parole Board he wants things opened up. Apparently they are not permitted to release their reasons for the release. I think you're right. As I understand it the sentence handed down was +- par for the era and not formally challenged with regard to it's leniency at the time but had been reviewed. It stinks, but I think the Boards hand were tied. wasent he actually only convicted of one rape and only drugging the rest. |
|
|
|
Post by bodger on Jan 6, 2018 9:07:01 GMT
let's hope the CPS now proceeds with the outstanding 88 (?) rape allegations.
I understand that in some US states the convict has to pay for his board and lodging ....... that would be so much better than the present system where the man can live at our cost, while his investments grow.
|
|
|
|
Post by Graham on Jan 6, 2018 9:07:37 GMT
I think you're right. As I understand it the sentence handed down was +- par for the era and not formally challenged with regard to it's leniency at the time but had been reviewed. It stinks, but I think the Boards hand were tied. wasent he actually only convicted of one rape and only drugging the rest. Yes from my understanding and there was not enough evidence in a lot of other cases to prosecute |
|
|
|
Post by quaysider on Jan 6, 2018 10:46:46 GMT
that one's in poor taste foxy...
|
|
