|
Post by Clinton Cool on Oct 19, 2020 14:40:46 GMT
I rather liked these comments from Daily Mail contributors. I say 'contributors' rather than 'readers' as I think most people just go to the comments section for a bit of banter and slagging. I don't think anyone actually reads the 'articles'. "The test does not identify any actual live virus...it looks for a tiny section of it's RNA. If you have no virus, you could have a tiny part of this in the soup which is your bodily fluid. You may have had the illness months ago, your body may have fought it off and bits still inside you. If the test is set too sensitive then there is a greater chance that a random bit of matching junk will be found then you will be a "case", except you aren't, you are a false positive. Think going in to a scrap yard and finding a car registration plate and expecting to find a complete, working matching vehicle. The government publishes no data on false positives and the sensitivity is ramped up way beyond where inconsequential random bits of dna will be amplified and flagged as a "case". The testing is perfect for continuing this Hoax." "Nobody gives a flying fc.uk about 'CASES'. Cases mean nothing and this is all meaningless drivel. We are used to seeing patients on the floor, parked on trolleys in hallways in hospitals because of "NHS cuts" and the media loses no opportunity to publish that as often as they can. That's in normal years. Not this year, no. Hospitals have been strangely dead in 2020. Now imagine all those people you can't see, that are usually there the rest of the time. Where are they right now in this national disgrace of a health service? Being ignored, that's where." in view that the frigging fox continues to bore us with his quotations from the sensationalist press, may I suggest that we club together and buy the muck-spreader a subscription to a respected quality online newspaper, to be taken up by him on condition that he ceases to post daily fail crap.
the only issue is: can anyone suggest such a rarified publication?
Jim recommends The Guardian. It's respected, high quality, impartial and balanced, according to Jim.
|
|
|
Post by bodger on Oct 19, 2020 15:02:33 GMT
in view that the frigging fox continues to bore us with his quotations from the sensationalist press, may I suggest that we club together and buy the muck-spreader a subscription to a respected quality online newspaper, to be taken up by him on condition that he ceases to post daily fail crap.
the only issue is: can anyone suggest such a rarified publication?
Being fair, these quotes are accurate in many ways. OMG ....... you've just tarred yourself with mail slime.
is there a man or woman of taste in the house today?
|
|
|
Post by bodger on Oct 19, 2020 15:05:58 GMT
in view that the frigging fox continues to bore us with his quotations from the sensationalist press, may I suggest that we club together and buy the muck-spreader a subscription to a respected quality online newspaper, to be taken up by him on condition that he ceases to post daily fail crap.
the only issue is: can anyone suggest such a rarified publication?
Jim recommends The Guardian. It's respected, high quality, impartial and balanced, according to Jim. according to Jim ................................ ....................................... perhaps Private Eye or the Independent might be better ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2020 15:06:02 GMT
Yes but I don't take a paper.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2020 15:07:29 GMT
in view that the frigging fox continues to bore us with his quotations from the sensationalist press, may I suggest that we club together and buy the muck-spreader a subscription to a respected quality online newspaper, to be taken up by him on condition that he ceases to post daily fail crap. the only issue is: can anyone suggest such a rarified publication?
If it was online that would be easy, shame its paper only. Private Eye I'm just to slow at typing.....
|
|
|
Post by ianali on Oct 19, 2020 15:09:07 GMT
Being fair, these quotes are accurate in many ways. OMG ....... you've just tarred yourself with mail slime.
is there a man or woman of taste in the house today?
I read no newspapers. Was commenting on the quotes. You would need to be a blind man not too recognise parts of them as correct.
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Oct 19, 2020 15:47:03 GMT
I rather liked these comments from Daily Mail contributors. I say 'contributors' rather than 'readers' as I think most people just go to the comments section for a bit of banter and slagging. I don't think anyone actually reads the 'articles'. "The test does not identify any actual live virus...it looks for a tiny section of it's RNA. If you have no virus, you could have a tiny part of this in the soup which is your bodily fluid. You may have had the illness months ago, your body may have fought it off and bits still inside you. If the test is set too sensitive then there is a greater chance that a random bit of matching junk will be found then you will be a "case", except you aren't, you are a false positive. Think going in to a scrap yard and finding a car registration plate and expecting to find a complete, working matching vehicle. The government publishes no data on false positives and the sensitivity is ramped up way beyond where inconsequential random bits of dna will be amplified and flagged as a "case". The testing is perfect for continuing this Hoax." "Nobody gives a flying fc.uk about 'CASES'. Cases mean nothing and this is all meaningless drivel. We are used to seeing patients on the floor, parked on trolleys in hallways in hospitals because of "NHS cuts" and the media loses no opportunity to publish that as often as they can. That's in normal years. Not this year, no. Hospitals have been strangely dead in 2020. Now imagine all those people you can't see, that are usually there the rest of the time. Where are they right now in this national disgrace of a health service? Being ignored, that's where." the only issue is: can anyone suggest such a rarified publication?
I already subscribe to Private Eye. The cartoon jokes are a bit crap, but there's a lot of good stuff otherwise. I think the above quotes are worth reading. It's true - what the hell does 'cases' mean? Yesterday, another 659 cases.... of what? People having become infected? People having been tested and found to have antibodies from... err... something? Deaths from Covid-19? (which nobody knows what it is yet!!). Anyway, the test kits - do they work - really? What about those Made in China? (and how much did the Chinese coronavirus-spreaders charge for those, eh?) Cases of 'false positives'? Cases of 'false negatives'? Cases of 'Government fiddling the statistics'?
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Oct 19, 2020 15:50:09 GMT
Jim recommends The Guardian. It's respected, high quality, impartial and balanced, according to Jim. according to Jim ................................ ....................................... perhaps Private Eye or the Independent might be better ? The 'Independent' is certainly NOT independent. I was cynical about that when it first appeared around 1986. Who owns it now? Probably some Russian.
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Oct 19, 2020 15:57:35 GMT
"The Independent is a British newspaper that was established in 1986 as a national morning printed paper and is now an online newspaper only. ... The newspaper was controlled by Tony O'Reilly's Irish Independent News & Media from 1997 until it was sold to the Russian businessman Alexander Lebedev in 2010." There ya go! I was right about the date - 1986. I was driving a bus to Enfield (the 310) and was thinking to myself 'independent'... that sounds like bollocks. And so it came to be so. 'Two Beards Lebedev'. Under Putin's thumb? "The Lebedevs have an opaque relationship with Putin. Despite Alexander portraying himself as a critic of the regime, he has increasingly taken a pro-Putin line." bylinetimes.com/2019/10/22/the-curious-tale-of-the-russian-spys-son-and-the-man-who-would-be-king-of-the-world/ With London being the world's capital for money laundering, does anything surprise us?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2020 16:10:04 GMT
How about getting everyone to register their belief in covid as a threat, then lifting all restrictions. When folks get ill, only those who agreed it was a problem get treatment.
|
|
|
Post by ianali on Oct 19, 2020 16:20:08 GMT
How about getting everyone to register their belief in covid as a threat, then lifting all restrictions. When folks get ill, only those who agreed it was a problem get treatment. And those that agree it is a problem have to stay home for the rest of their lives, aside from going to work. They also have their taxes doubled forever for debt repayments.
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Oct 19, 2020 16:25:09 GMT
How about getting everyone to register their belief in covid as a threat, then lifting all restrictions. When folks get ill, only those who agreed it was a problem get treatment. Yep - as long as people who smoke tobacco don't get to use the NHS when they get cancer, and those who drink and get sclerosis are refused access to the NHS, and those who do 'sports' have to go to private medicine practitioners when they fall over and break their stupid leg? After months of reading about 'Covid-19' I still can't make much sense of it all, and don't know what to believe. Seeing is Believing, as they say. Perhaps being at 'the coal face' in hospitals where hundreds are dying might bring home the awful reality of it... yet, I read all the hospitals are empty. The 'Nightingale' emergency throw-ups - empty from the start? Why? True? A big fib? What? Where? Why? How? When?! I don't know of anybody who has 'had Covid' and I don't know of anybody who knows someone who had. I try to look at things from all angles, adding in my own experiences. New World Order / Evil World Economic Forum / Chinese take-over ... or really a virus that has 'spread from bats' and is out of control? Norway reports finds of a mutant variety of Covid-19 now. How the hell do you know it's a mutant sort if you don't even know what C-19 is to start with??!! How can anyone believe what governments tells you, when we have all known for years that politicians are lying if you can see their mouths move? Still, coronavirus has brightened up what would otherwise be a fairly dull year.
|
|
|
Post by naughtyfox on Oct 19, 2020 16:37:17 GMT
How about getting everyone to register their belief in covid as a threat, then lifting all restrictions. When folks get ill, only those who agreed it was a problem get treatment. And those that agree it is a problem have to stay home for the rest of their lives, aside from going to work. They also have their taxes doubled forever for debt repayments. Dishy Rishi distributing the billions like confetti.... he'll be gone and ancient history and retired with a gong and peerage in the House of Slime by the time our grandchildren in 40 years' time are still paying for his friends making a mint. Bonking Boris will have gone just like Tony Blair - moaned about but never punished for their crimes. Jenrick and Hancock and Gove sitting on their pots of gold in some agreeable twee village in the Cotswolds. Who can make an accurate prediction as to how this will turn out? My original thoughts were that this coronavirus would be forgotten about in a year (last March I said that)... but it looks like a lot of people having lost their jobs will certainly not be forgetting it. Disruption and chaos all around at the moment. Travels abroad severely limited. People dying in their thousands next year due to no access to hospitals for their cancers and stomach ulcers ... mental illness (much due to 'lockdown') off the charts. Lots of people in Kokkola (where I work) wearing face masks... it's very noticeable. Is it for real? Is it for fashion? Is it because it's 'recommended'? Is it a good thing? Is it a load of nonsense and gruesomely bizarre? What happens when it snows and you get snow down your mask?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2020 16:38:39 GMT
How about getting everyone to register their belief in covid as a threat, then lifting all restrictions. When folks get ill, only those who agreed it was a problem get treatment. I try to look at things from all angles, adding in my own experiences.
|
|
|
Post by bodger on Oct 19, 2020 18:35:37 GMT
After months of reading about 'Covid-19' I still can't make much sense of it all, and don't know what to believe. Seeing is Believing, as they say. Perhaps being at 'the coal face' in hospitals where hundreds are dying might bring home the awful reality of it... yet, I read all the hospitals are empty. The 'Nightingale' emergency throw-ups - empty from the start? Why? True? A big fib? What? Where? Why? How? When?! I don't know of anybody who has 'had Covid' and I don't know of anybody who knows someone who had. I try to look at things from all angles, adding in my own experiences. you really need to get out more and not base your opinions on the gutter press.
and before you mention it, you are not qualified to comment on Covid in the UK if you are absent. I for one couldn't give a flying fuck what happens in the Arctic lands.
|
|