|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Apr 18, 2024 12:54:25 GMT
The half-tide gate in Savick Brook, and the bottom gates of lock No.8 in Savick Brook are a separate matter. The lock tail and outer cill at Tarleton almost dry out at local Low Water, but the lock keepers at Tarleton will pen you in to or out of the Douglas as soon as the Flood has made enough depth to float you over the outer cill and the muck in the lock tail, . . or at any other time whilst there's sufficient depth for your boat over the outer cill and in the lock tail. Once you're in the river there, you're free to follow any passage schedule you want to. At the Preston end of the trip, there's a floating stage you can tie up to near the A583 road bridge over Savick Brook if you're late on the tide, or if it's a poor tide that doesn't make prediction, and the Ebb has run down too far to have enough depth to get up as far as Lock No. 8. But, . . penning out at Tarleton early on the Flood is the crackpot C&RT way of doing things, . . and means your going to be stemming the Flood pretty well all the way down the Douglas to where it meets and runs into the Ribble at Five Mile Perch - Astland Light - where you'll arrive at somewhere near to local High Water, . . just in time for the first of the Ebb in the Ribble, . . and then you'll be stemming that all the way up to the Savick Brook's Ribble outfall, . . and you'll continue stemming the Ebb running back down Savick Brook's narrowest shallowest part up as far as lock No. 8., the first lock on what actually IS the 'Ribble Link', . . about four miles of non-tidal canalised drainage ditch, upon which C&RT operate a strict booked in advance, very limited numbers, one-way working only on alternate days routine. All in all, . . a masterly piece of tidal passage planning by C&RT. The return trip from Preston back to Tarleton is equally well planned, . . adverse tides throughout the trip, . . and falling when you least want them to be. There is in fact a much preferable, easier, safer, fuel saving alternative to the ridiculous amateurish C&RT scheduling (for Tarleton - Preston), which always means being left with no choice other than to leave Tarleton for Preston as early on the Flood as you can. The alternative running schedule - the sensible, professional way to work round tide times - guarantees getting you to and into Savick Brook shortly before local HW, with no possibility of needing to sit out the next tide in Preston Marina (formerly Preston Docks). It also saves you having to stem the Ebb pretty well all the way up from Five Mile Perch/Astland Light. The Flood pushes you all the way up the Ribble, and you've a rising tide for the anything but straightforward turn off the river into Savick Brook. There's a much better alternative to the C&RT nonsense for scheduling/planning the Preston - Tarleton return trip too. Well I for one would be interested to hear your proposal. Presumably it involves sitting out low water in the Ribble estuary. I have no idea whether there is sufficient depth to do that (probably depends on the type of tide) but surely, even though there would be less fuel consumed, it would take longer bobbing about waiting for the tide to come in? Reply posted in Ribble Link thread.
|
|
|
Post by on Apr 20, 2024 19:28:12 GMT
|
|
|
Post by on Apr 20, 2024 19:29:13 GMT
I never watched the video before.
Its actually really quite funny.
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Apr 20, 2024 19:38:09 GMT
No it isn't. Unless your focus of humour is the totally crap.
Did the entire clan have weird voices?
|
|
|
Post by on Apr 20, 2024 20:07:20 GMT
Shut up
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Apr 20, 2024 20:10:35 GMT
No.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Apr 21, 2024 21:32:48 GMT
Apr 3, 2024 12:33:11 GMT 1 Andyberg said: Cant find any trace of Mersey or Wyre in the for sale ads now…mebbee they have both sold? _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ For the attention of professional liars Tom Deards, Lucy Barry, and all the other crooked staff at the Canal & River Trust's Illegal & Connivance Services
If Commercial Boat Services/Brian Clarke have sold either boat they're in big trouble, . . the Law - that's the real Law, NOT the pretend version that C&RT sells to mindless pricks such as Andyberg, dogless, Aloysius, kris, and nobody - says that title to those two L&L Shortboats, Mersey and Wyre, remains with the owners they were seized from by the C&RT and its thieving contractors. It's far more likely that both boats have been taken off the market because of the increasingly widespread publicity given to the fact that neither vessel is C&RT's or Commercial Boat Services to sell. 'Seizing' goods, an item, property, or belongings does not equate with acquiring 'good title', . . unless the seizure of the goods (etc.) has been properly and specifically authorized or ordered by way of an enactment, a Writ, or a Warrant. This, apparently, incomprehensible (for all C&RT's gullible, unthinking supporters) and (for C&RT and CBS) inconvenient but undeniable fact, is what makes every single one of C&RT's Section 8 boat "removals" unlawful, . . because the 'seizure' of the vessel in question is executed with the predetermined intention of either destroying the vessel, or selling it on to a third party, . . entirely absent any authority or documentation originating from any enactment or Court ordered 'seizure power' to do so lawfully/legally. ___________________________________________________ Paragraph 2) of Schedule 12) to the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 states :- Enforcement agents
2(1) In this Schedule “enforcement agent” means an individual authorised by section 63(2) to act as an enforcement agent. 2(2) Only an enforcement agent may take control of goods and sell them under an enforcement power. _____________________________________________ The words - "enforcement power" are of special significance with regard to C&RT's unlawful seizures of Section 8'd boats from their rightful owners. Neither C&RT, nor Commercial Boat Services bogus Bailiffs, have ever acted or are ever authorized to act under any such "enforcement power". It follows therefore that C&RT's Section 8 boat 'seizures', and the 'evictions' of the owners that usually accompany the 'seizing' of the vessel are all, without exception, wholly unlawful/illegal. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Keeping in mind what's written above, . . now read what's written below :- "In the course of the obiter dictum recorded in the transcript, the trial Judge, HHJ Halbert, went to some trouble to ensure that Geoffrey Mayers, the boat owner, fully understood the law with regard to the ownership of the boat that the C&RT had removed from the canal. Although the C&RT led the boat owner to believe that his boat 'Pearl' was legally 'seized' when it was lifted it out of the canal near Northwich, transported by road to the Gloucester area, then the owner told that it now belonged to the C&RT, was impounded by its agents, and that he was not allowed access to it, . . the Judge told Geoffrey Mayers that he did in fact retain full unencumbered ownership and good title to the vessel, . . and that he was within his rights, and the law, to go and collect his boat at any time he wished to, . . reclaiming it from the C&RT agents who held it, unlawfully impounded, on C&RT's instructions. This informative, and rather difficult to argue with combination of Judicial guidance and legal opinion, was discovered by Nigel Moore and I in a copy of a trial transcript I had whilst we were working on and preparing a (successful) Defence to a 2014 C&RT County Court Claim for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief in respect of another boat (not 'Pearl') that this so-called Trust had in its sights, . . with the intention of stealing it from the rightful owner, . . as the Canal & River Trust has, by 2024, now done to hundreds of boat owners in the course of many hundreds of unlawfully executed Section 8 boat removals."
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________ To ensure that the contents of this post come to the attention of C&RT's bent lawyers, and Brian Clarke, the crook who owns and runs Commercial Boat Services, . . it will be re-posted, repeatedly and for as long a period of time as necessary, on this and other threads. Its significance won't be lost on C&RT professional liars Tom Deards and Lucy Barry, or the other crooked lawyers and staff at C&RT's Illegal & Connivance Services, . . despite meaning absolutely nothing at all to Thunderboat's dim-witted little group of mental cripples. narrowboatworld.com/15306-a-criminal-offence-update
|
|
|
Post by on Apr 21, 2024 21:33:38 GMT
Just when you thought it was safe to suggest Tina Turner was cool*
*she was.
|
|
|
Post by on Apr 21, 2024 21:34:55 GMT
Gotta love scripts. Saves having to do the actual job!
Just program in what you want it to say and when and hey presto.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Apr 22, 2024 0:00:42 GMT
You [posting as 'no name'] would be well advised to make the above posts the last example of blatantly targeted nuisance trolling, harassment, and on-line stalking in which you ever indulge. You would also be well advised to acquaint yourself with the relevant Sections of this Act :- www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1997/40/contentsIf you wish to avoid prosecution under the provisions of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, you must refrain from adding to your extensive existing catalogue of past offences, and cease committing any further offences of the same nature. I have no objection, for the present, if in future you cease the wilful targeted trolling of topics/threads I have initiated, and confine the content resulting from your constant close monitoring of the content I post on this internet forum to the vast selection of pointless claptrap laden topics/threads from which you and the other forum arsewipes appear to gain so much mindless satisfaction.
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Apr 22, 2024 5:12:34 GMT
Gotta love scripts. Saves having to do the actual job! Just program in what you want it to say and when and hey presto. where have you seen this in action, we need an example?
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Apr 22, 2024 6:24:35 GMT
Apr 3, 2024 12:33:11 GMT 1 Andyberg said: Cant find any trace of Mersey or Wyre in the for sale ads now…mebbee they have both sold? ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ For the attention of professional liars Tom Deards, Lucy Barry, and all the other crooked staff at the Canal & River Trust's Illegal & Connivance Services
If Commercial Boat Services/Brian Clarke have sold either boat they're in big trouble, . . the Law - that's the real Law, NOT the pretend version that C&RT sells to mindless pricks such as Andyberg, dogless, Aloysius, kris, and nobody - says that title to those two L&L Shortboats, Mersey and Wyre, remains with the owners they were seized from by the C&RT and its thieving contractors. It's far more likely that both boats have been taken off the market because of the increasingly widespread publicity given to the fact that neither vessel is C&RT's or Commercial Boat Services to sell. 'Seizing' goods, an item, property, or belongings does not equate with acquiring 'good title', . . unless the seizure of the goods (etc.) has been properly and specifically authorized or ordered by way of an enactment, a Writ, or a Warrant. This, apparently, incomprehensible (for all C&RT's gullible, unthinking supporters) and (for C&RT and CBS) inconvenient but undeniable fact, is what makes every single one of C&RT's Section 8 boat "removals" unlawful, . . because the 'seizure' of the vessel in question is executed with the predetermined intention of either destroying the vessel, or selling it on to a third party, . . entirely absent any authority or documentation originating from any enactment or Court ordered 'seizure power' to do so lawfully/legally. ___________________________________________________ Paragraph 2) of Schedule 12) to the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 states :- Enforcement agents
2(1) In this Schedule “enforcement agent” means an individual authorised by section 63(2) to act as an enforcement agent. 2(2) Only an enforcement agent may take control of goods and sell them under an enforcement power. _____________________________________________ The words - "enforcement power" are of special significance with regard to C&RT's unlawful seizures of Section 8'd boats from their rightful owners. Neither C&RT, nor Commercial Boat Services bogus Bailiffs, have ever acted or are ever authorized to act under any such "enforcement power". It follows therefore that C&RT's Section 8 boat 'seizures', and the 'evictions' of the owners that usually accompany the 'seizing' of the vessel are all, without exception, wholly unlawful/illegal. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Keeping in mind what's written above, . . now read what's written below :- "In the course of the obiter dictum recorded in the transcript, the trial Judge, HHJ Halbert, went to some trouble to ensure that Geoffrey Mayers, the boat owner, fully understood the law with regard to the ownership of the boat that the C&RT had removed from the canal. Although the C&RT led the boat owner to believe that his boat 'Pearl' was legally 'seized' when it was lifted it out of the canal near Northwich, transported by road to the Gloucester area, then the owner told that it now belonged to the C&RT, was impounded by its agents, and that he was not allowed access to it, . . the Judge told Geoffrey Mayers that he did in fact retain full unencumbered ownership and good title to the vessel, . . and that he was within his rights, and the law, to go and collect his boat at any time he wished to, . . reclaiming it from the C&RT agents who held it, unlawfully impounded, on C&RT's instructions. This informative, and rather difficult to argue with combination of Judicial guidance and legal opinion, was discovered by Nigel Moore and I in a copy of a trial transcript I had whilst we were working on and preparing a (successful) Defence to a 2014 C&RT County Court Claim for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief in respect of another boat (not 'Pearl') that this so-called Trust had in its sights, . . with the intention of stealing it from the rightful owner, . . as the Canal & River Trust has, by 2024, now done to hundreds of boat owners in the course of many hundreds of unlawfully executed Section 8 boat removals."
___________________________________________________________________________________________________ To ensure that the contents of this post come to the attention of C&RT's bent lawyers, and Brian Clarke, the crook who owns and runs Commercial Boat Services, . . it will be re-posted, repeatedly and for as long a period of time as necessary, on this and other threads. Its significance won't be lost on C&RT professional liars Tom Deards and Lucy Barry, or the other crooked lawyers and staff at C&RT's Illegal & Connivance Services, . . despite meaning absolutely nothing at all to Thunderboat's dim-witted little group of mental cripples. narrowboatworld.com/15306-a-criminal-offence-update
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Apr 22, 2024 7:04:11 GMT
|
|
|
Post by on Apr 22, 2024 8:49:17 GMT
Gotta love scripts. Saves having to do the actual job!
Just program in what you want it to say and when and hey presto.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Apr 22, 2024 8:52:03 GMT
Apr 3, 2024 12:33:11 GMT 1 Andyberg said: Cant find any trace of Mersey or Wyre in the for sale ads now…mebbee they have both sold? _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ For the attention of professional liars Tom Deards, Lucy Barry, and all the other crooked staff at the Canal & River Trust's Illegal & Connivance Services
If Commercial Boat Services/Brian Clarke have sold either boat they're in big trouble, . . the Law - that's the real Law, NOT the pretend version that C&RT sells to mindless pricks such as Andyberg, dogless, Aloysius, kris, and nobody - says that title to those two L&L Shortboats, Mersey and Wyre, remains with the owners they were seized from by the C&RT and its thieving contractors. It's far more likely that both boats have been taken off the market because of the increasingly widespread publicity given to the fact that neither vessel is C&RT's or Commercial Boat Services to sell. 'Seizing' goods, an item, property, or belongings does not equate with acquiring 'good title', . . unless the seizure of the goods (etc.) has been properly and specifically authorized or ordered by way of an enactment, a Writ, or a Warrant. This, apparently, incomprehensible (for all C&RT's gullible, unthinking supporters) and (for C&RT and CBS) inconvenient but undeniable fact, is what makes every single one of C&RT's Section 8 boat "removals" unlawful, . . because the 'seizure' of the vessel in question is executed with the predetermined intention of either destroying the vessel, or selling it on to a third party, . . entirely absent any authority or documentation originating from any enactment or Court ordered 'seizure power' to do so lawfully/legally. ___________________________________________________ Paragraph 2) of Schedule 12) to the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 states :- Enforcement agents
2(1) In this Schedule “enforcement agent” means an individual authorised by section 63(2) to act as an enforcement agent. 2(2) Only an enforcement agent may take control of goods and sell them under an enforcement power. _____________________________________________ The words - "enforcement power" are of special significance with regard to C&RT's unlawful seizures of Section 8'd boats from their rightful owners. Neither C&RT, nor Commercial Boat Services bogus Bailiffs, have ever acted or are ever authorized to act under any such "enforcement power". It follows therefore that C&RT's Section 8 boat 'seizures', and the 'evictions' of the owners that usually accompany the 'seizing' of the vessel are all, without exception, wholly unlawful/illegal. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Keeping in mind what's written above, . . now read what's written below :- "In the course of the obiter dictum recorded in the transcript, the trial Judge, HHJ Halbert, went to some trouble to ensure that Geoffrey Mayers, the boat owner, fully understood the law with regard to the ownership of the boat that the C&RT had removed from the canal. Although the C&RT led the boat owner to believe that his boat 'Pearl' was legally 'seized' when it was lifted it out of the canal near Northwich, transported by road to the Gloucester area, then the owner told that it now belonged to the C&RT, was impounded by its agents, and that he was not allowed access to it, . . the Judge told Geoffrey Mayers that he did in fact retain full unencumbered ownership and good title to the vessel, . . and that he was within his rights, and the law, to go and collect his boat at any time he wished to, . . reclaiming it from the C&RT agents who held it, unlawfully impounded, on C&RT's instructions. This informative, and rather difficult to argue with combination of Judicial guidance and legal opinion, was discovered by Nigel Moore and I in a copy of a trial transcript I had whilst we were working on and preparing a (successful) Defence to a 2014 C&RT County Court Claim for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief in respect of another boat (not 'Pearl') that this so-called Trust had in its sights, . . with the intention of stealing it from the rightful owner, . . as the Canal & River Trust has, by 2024, now done to hundreds of boat owners in the course of many hundreds of unlawfully executed Section 8 boat removals."
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________ To ensure that the contents of this post come to the attention of C&RT's bent lawyers, and Brian Clarke, the crook who owns and runs Commercial Boat Services, . . it will be re-posted, repeatedly and for as long a period of time as necessary, on this and other threads. Its significance won't be lost on C&RT professional liars Tom Deards and Lucy Barry, or the other crooked lawyers and staff at C&RT's Illegal & Connivance Services, . . despite meaning absolutely nothing at all to Thunderboat's dim-witted little group of mental cripples. narrowboatworld.com/15306-a-criminal-offence-update
|
|