|
Post by TonyDunkley on May 26, 2021 22:51:42 GMT
Well best guess is that it would provoke them into the threatened “commencement of legal proceedings” which would give him the opportunity to make the defence that you can’t defame or libel someone with the truth, and to justify that by airing his evidence of the truthfulness of his assertions in court, which would give CRT a bloody nose. But it does seem to me that, by “wearing his heart on his sleeve” he is unlikely to be able to dupe them into doing something as a result of such obvious baiting. He’s just shit at fishing isn’t he…. Who's fishing ? I'm certainly not, . . I already have all the evidence I need of C&RT's abuse of due process, . . and worse !
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on May 26, 2021 22:52:19 GMT
And what do you imagine that might achieve? Well best guess is that it would provoke them into the threatened “commencement of legal proceedings” which would give him the opportunity to make the defence that you can’t defame or libel someone with the truth, and to justify that by airing his evidence of the truthfulness of his assertions in court, which would give CRT a bloody nose. But even if all of that did happen, it would have no effect whatsoever on the seizure of Halcyon Daze as that was taken as a result of an entirely different legal action, which has now reached its conclusion.
|
|
|
Post by TonyDunkley on May 26, 2021 23:10:21 GMT
Well best guess is that it would provoke them into the threatened “commencement of legal proceedings” which would give him the opportunity to make the defence that you can’t defame or libel someone with the truth, and to justify that by airing his evidence of the truthfulness of his assertions in court, which would give CRT a bloody nose. But even if all of that did happen, it would have no effect whatsoever on the seizure of Halcyon Daze as that was taken as a result of an entirely different legal action, which has now reached its conclusion. There was nothing "legal" about my eviction from and the "seizure" of "Halcyon Daze". A fact which may eventually dawn on you, . . if you can find someone with a moderate command of plain written English, and endless patience, to explain the wording of the 15 August 2019 (Court) Order and S.8 of the 1983 BW Act to you, . . and the relevant sections and sub-sections of the Theft Act 1968, the TIG Act 1977, the Fraud Act 2006, and the TCE Act 2007.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on May 27, 2021 8:35:13 GMT
But even if all of that did happen, it would have no effect whatsoever on the seizure of Halcyon Daze as that was taken as a result of an entirely different legal action, which has now reached its conclusion. There was nothing "legal" about my eviction from and the "seizure" of "Halcyon Daze". A fact which may eventually dawn on you, . . if you can find someone with a moderate command of plain written English, and endless patience, to explain the wording of the 15 August 2019 (Court) Order and S.8 of the 1983 BW Act to you, . . and the relevant sections and sub-sections of the Theft Act 1968, the TIG Act 1977, the Fraud Act 2006, and the TCE Act 2007. The court order wasn't issued as a result of legal action?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 27, 2021 9:46:23 GMT
I wonder if it was a similar situation which gave rise the term "liveaboard gits".
|
|
|
Post by thebfg on May 27, 2021 9:53:45 GMT
Did Proboards actually delete any of your posts? I can’t remember. Yes they did, . . one made on 18 November 2020 at 1243 hrs, and one made on 25 November 2020 at 0804 hrs. I'm going to re-post exactly the same facts and information, . . only this time in far greater detail, and with some additions. Did they delete the posts which quoted them?
|
|
|
Post by TonyDunkley on May 27, 2021 14:20:00 GMT
There was nothing "legal" about my eviction from and the "seizure" of "Halcyon Daze". A fact which may eventually dawn on you, . . if you can find someone with a moderate command of plain written English, and endless patience, to explain the wording of the 15 August 2019 (Court) Order and S.8 of the 1983 BW Act to you, . . and the relevant sections and sub-sections of the Theft Act 1968, the TIG Act 1977, the Fraud Act 2006, and the TCE Act 2007. The court order wasn't issued as a result of legal action? Here you are, . . same post you quoted, but in a bigger typeface to make it easier for someone to read and explain to you : -- There was nothing "legal" about my eviction from and the "seizure" of "Halcyon Daze". A fact which may eventually dawn on you, . . if you can find someone with a moderate command of plain written English, and endless patience, to explain the wording of the 15 August 2019 (Court) Order and S.8 of the 1983 BW Act to you, . . and the relevant sections and sub-sections of the Theft Act 1968, the TIG Act 1977, the Fraud Act 2006, and the TCE Act 2007.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on May 27, 2021 14:28:40 GMT
The court order wasn't issued as a result of legal action? Here you are, . . same post you quoted, but in a bigger typeface to make it easier for someone to read and explain to you : -- There was nothing "legal" about my eviction from and the "seizure" of "Halcyon Daze". A fact which may eventually dawn on you, . . if you can find someone with a moderate command of plain written English, and endless patience, to explain the wording of the 15 August 2019 (Court) Order and S.8 of the 1983 BW Act to you, . . and the relevant sections and sub-sections of the Theft Act 1968, the TIG Act 1977, the Fraud Act 2006, and the TCE Act 2007.Ok, perhaps another Thunderboater with a moderate command of plain written English and endless patience can explain to me why the court order handed down on 15th August 2019 did not form part of a legal action. Only I think you'll find that a legal action is still a legal action, even if the loser has a major sad-on about it.
|
|
|
Post by TonyDunkley on May 27, 2021 14:32:58 GMT
Yes they did, . . one made on 18 November 2020 at 1243 hrs, and one made on 25 November 2020 at 0804 hrs. I'm going to re-post exactly the same facts and information, . . only this time in far greater detail, and with some additions. Did they delete the posts which quoted them? I don't think so, but as far as I can remember they weren't quoted all that much. I remember you quoting them - and saying why you'd done it - but I think that by far the largest proportion of responses to them were from the TB goon squad collective whingeing about how I was jeopardizing the future of their parochial playground.
|
|
|
Post by TonyDunkley on May 27, 2021 14:39:43 GMT
Here you are, . . same post you quoted, but in a bigger typeface to make it easier for someone to read and explain to you : -- There was nothing "legal" about my eviction from and the "seizure" of "Halcyon Daze". A fact which may eventually dawn on you, . . if you can find someone with a moderate command of plain written English, and endless patience, to explain the wording of the 15 August 2019 (Court) Order and S.8 of the 1983 BW Act to you, . . and the relevant sections and sub-sections of the Theft Act 1968, the TIG Act 1977, the Fraud Act 2006, and the TCE Act 2007.Ok, perhaps another Thunderboater with a moderate command of plain written English and endless patience can explain to me why the court order handed down on 15th August 2019 did not form part of a legal action. Only I think you'll find that a legal action is still a legal action, even if the loser has a major sad-on about it. Oh dear, . . still having trouble reading it, . . typeface perhaps still not big enough. Try this : -- There was nothing "legal" about my eviction from and the "seizure" of "Halcyon Daze". A fact which may eventually dawn on you, . . if you can find someone with a moderate command of plain written English, and endless patience, to explain the wording of the 15 August 2019 (Court) Order and S.8 of the 1983 BW Act to you, . . and the relevant sections and sub-sections of the Theft Act 1968, the TIG Act 1977, the Fraud Act 2006, and the TCE Act 2007.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on May 27, 2021 14:41:24 GMT
I think this bloke is a couple of sandwiches short of a picnic.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 27, 2021 14:55:05 GMT
Did they delete the posts which quoted them? TB goon squad collective whingeing about how I was jeopardizing the future of their parochial playground. It wasn’t a squad, it was just Roger mainly.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 27, 2021 14:56:01 GMT
I think this bloke is a couple of sandwiches short of a picnic. Or two boats short of a fleet.
|
|
|
Post by Gone on May 27, 2021 14:57:09 GMT
Ok, perhaps another Thunderboater with a moderate command of plain written English and endless patience can explain to me why the court order handed down on 15th August 2019 did not form part of a legal action. Only I think you'll find that a legal action is still a legal action, even if the loser has a major sad-on about it. Oh dear, . . still having trouble reading it, . . typeface perhaps still not big enough. Try this : -- There was nothing "legal" about my eviction from and the "seizure" of "Halcyon Daze". A fact which may eventually dawn on you, . . if you can find someone with a moderate command of plain written English, and endless patience, to explain the wording of the 15 August 2019 (Court) Order and S.8 of the 1983 BW Act to you, . . and the relevant sections and sub-sections of the Theft Act 1968, the TIG Act 1977, the Fraud Act 2006, and the TCE Act 2007.Unfortunately using a big font and bold letters doesn’t actually strengthen your argument that S8 of the 1983 BW act doesn’t apply to your boat that was moored without legal authority and in contravention of the order against you.
|
|
|
Post by kris on May 27, 2021 14:58:18 GMT
I think this bloke is a couple of sandwiches short of a picnic. Or two boats short of a fleet. He’s just bat shit crazy.
|
|