|
Post by on Jan 14, 2023 17:16:34 GMT
There's no chance of that happening without first taking the psychopaths and nutcases out of the reckoning - permanently. It's clear that none of the gutless invertebrates who slunk off to TheUnstableBar are ever going to do anything to that end, . . and it also appears that Delta9 is quite content to stand by and do nothing whilst these arseholes continue intentionally discouraging existing, or new, members to post on the Thunderboat. kris you have to quote it otherwise it gets confusing later. The bot progranming code has autodelete written into it.
|
|
|
Post by on Jan 14, 2023 17:20:35 GMT
It's clear that none of the gutless invertebrates who slunk off to TheUnstableBar are ever going to do anything to that end, . . I'm not entirely convinced that invertebrates actually can "slink", since slinking requires movement to be carried out in a particular fashion, generally in a stealthy or sensuous manner and invertebrates tend not to employ diverse means of locomotion. Apparently invertebrates do have guts which renders the phrase "gutless invertebrate" irrelevant. However there apparently some invertebrates who have not got normal guts and use the same orifice as an arse and a mouth.
|
|
|
Post by on Jan 14, 2023 17:23:17 GMT
|
|
|
Post by on Jan 14, 2023 17:27:42 GMT
The phrase "spineless invertebrate" would be technically correct by definition but it lacks the letter U which is such a powerful sound linguistically if one is looking to put forward the expression as a form of insult.
There are other well known words which use this form of the letter U and are also quite effective for this purpose.
Scum Cunt Fuck
Gutless is a really good one because it also has the T at a convenient point and the the S to finish it off works very well.
I think I like this word a lot.
Of course the addition of a fairly complex word which forces the reader to think is very clever.
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Jan 14, 2023 17:28:05 GMT
There's no chance of that happening without first taking the psychopaths and nutcases out of the reckoning - permanently. It's clear that none of the gutless invertebrates who slunk off to TheUnstableBar are ever going to do anything to that end, . . and it also appears that Delta9 is quite content to stand by and do nothing whilst these arseholes continue intentionally discouraging existing, or new, members to post on the Thunderboat. Delta 9 is now a member of TUB. If you weren't a rancid old fart you would have known this. Post saved for evidence of complete fuckwittery.
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Jan 14, 2023 17:31:06 GMT
I'm not entirely convinced that invertebrates actually can "slink", since slinking requires movement to be carried out in a particular fashion, generally in a stealthy or sensuous manner and invertebrates tend not to employ diverse means of locomotion. Apparently invertebrates do have guts which renders the phrase "gutless invertebrate" irrelevant. However there apparently some invertebrates who have not got normal guts and use the same orifice as an arse and a mouth. Slinky gutless invertebrates do exist, check my avatar, a slinky gutless invertebrate. Feel free to steal and use it.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Jan 14, 2023 17:44:35 GMT
The phrase "spineless invertebrate" would be technically correct by definition but it lacks the letter U which is such a powerful sound linguistically if one is looking to put forward the expression as a form of insult. It's a grammatical error though, it's a redundancy since the modifier's meaning is contained in the word it modifies, a bit like "free gift" or "new innovations".
|
|
|
Post by on Jan 14, 2023 17:58:52 GMT
Completely unique.
This is why gutless invertebrate is so good.
They don't exist but some of them only have partial digestive systems. It forces the person receiving the insult to first think about what an invertebrate is then follow up by concerning themselves with whether or not an invertebrate can be gutless.
I think it is the sign of a genius.
It really puts the ball in the other person's court. Very clever.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Jan 14, 2023 18:06:58 GMT
I still think "gutless invertebrate" is trumped by "worthless piece of sub-human rubbish".
|
|
|
Post by on Jan 14, 2023 18:12:22 GMT
I suppose it does have some linguistic merit. It is slightly long-winded though. Possibly the last two words with just one word in front would be more formal.
"Worthless sub-human rubbish" may be more 'to the point'. One must always avoid being too wordy with this sort of insult.
|
|
|
Post by on Jan 14, 2023 18:13:25 GMT
I think sub-human could be made into one word and it would present a lot better in text form.
|
|
|
Post by Telemachus on Jan 14, 2023 18:37:18 GMT
The phrase "spineless invertebrate" would be technically correct by definition but it lacks the letter U which is such a powerful sound linguistically if one is looking to put forward the expression as a form of insult. It's a grammatical error though, it's a redundancy since the modifier's meaning is contained in the word it modifies, a bit like "free gift" or "new innovations". If only you had gone to a proper school you would know that the word you are searching for is "tautological".
|
|
|
Post by on Jan 14, 2023 18:38:30 GMT
Tautological invertebrate !
This could work when addressing a human.
|
|
|
Post by kris on Jan 14, 2023 18:43:28 GMT
Tautological invertebrate ! This could work when addressing a human. Doesn’t sound like much of an insult.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Jan 14, 2023 18:53:19 GMT
It's a grammatical error though, it's a redundancy since the modifier's meaning is contained in the word it modifies, a bit like "free gift" or "new innovations". If only you had gone to a proper school you would know that the word you are searching for is "tautological". One of us evidently did go to a proper school. Or at least, a grammar school where they tend to focus on, you know, "grammar". "Redundancy happens when the repetition of a word or idea does not add anything to the previous usage; it just restates what has already been said, takes up space, and gets in the way without adding meaning.[5]" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redundancy_(linguistics)#:~:text=Redundancy%20happens%20when%20the%20repetition,the%20way%20without%20adding%20meaning. "Tautological" isn't even a noun, it's an adjective so how can something be "a tautological"?
|
|