|
Post by on Mar 25, 2023 8:16:52 GMT
Do you know about "interpretation"? I would tend to go with the interpretation of a legal professional with a silly wig than a random nut on an internet forum ! "What is the term of interpretation of the law? Interpretation in law is a rational process by which we understand a text. Through interpretation, we come to know the normative message of a text. It is a process that “extracts” the legal meaning of the text from its semantic." assets.press.princeton.edu/chapters/s7991.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjc5pTYyvb9AhXqQUEAHXvkC3kQFnoECAoQBg&usg=AOvVaw3qg-eQQEhGYV-0rJvHlovMOf course those kids at Princeton know nothing compared with a disgruntled ex commercial boat skipper from somewhere in the East Midlands.
|
|
|
Post by on Mar 25, 2023 8:18:33 GMT
To make it easier en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statutory_interpretation"Sometimes the words of a statute have a plain and a straightforward meaning. But in many cases, there is some ambiguity in the words of the statute that must be resolved by the judge. To find the meanings of statutes, judges use various tools and methods of statutory interpretation, including traditional canons of statutory interpretation, legislative history, and purpose. "
|
|
|
Post by on Mar 25, 2023 8:25:35 GMT
The question the Judge would need to ask himself is "how would a reasonable man interpret this?" Obviously in this story you don't count as a reasonable man because you are a disgruntled ex commercial boat skipper who has a history of problems with the navigation authority. Your views will always be jaundiced. If you showed this to the man on the Clapham Ombnibus then asked him if he thought the Board (navigation authority) were allowed to remove the vessel from the water do you really think he would interpret it as being outside of their powers to do this? I believe most people would think the word "move" would mean the boat stays afloat but "remove" does make people think in a different way. "I am going to remove the tea bag" Interpretation: Teabag ends up outside of the cup. "I am going to move the tea cup" Interpretation: The cup is going to a different position.
|
|
|
Post by on Mar 25, 2023 8:33:46 GMT
One would not only inspect dictionaries. Synonyms are a useful way of understanding the meaning of words. My invoice is in the post. Yes I do know the correct address.
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Mar 25, 2023 8:33:55 GMT
You're wasting your time. Please refer to Vince's earlier post in which he explains that everyone except Tony is stupid. Tony will only shut up when a) his views are vindicated in court or b) he dies. No prizes for correctly guessing which outcome will occur first.
|
|
|
Post by on Mar 25, 2023 8:38:14 GMT
He called me an amiable buffoon.
I am not gruntled by this.
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Mar 25, 2023 8:42:32 GMT
Which insult would you prefer?
|
|
|
Post by on Mar 25, 2023 8:48:05 GMT
Worthless inconsequential nobody please.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Dunkley on Mar 25, 2023 8:48:48 GMT
I think the thing with the pedal powered boat is a bit odd. She takes the power plant out of her boat, and then claims she cannot meet the minimum cruising recommendation which you would presume she could more easily with diesel power. This is also coupled with her saying there are no downsides to pedal power before binning it into the bank at a water point with the slightest breeze. George is a bit of a minor player in the doc, and sadly seems to have mentally declined somewhat since filming however I don't have anywhere near enough letters after my name to have that be anything more than speculation. The real significance of that video is the way it illustrates the extent to which C&RT has fooled almost everyone, including the Courts, into believing that it has the lawful authority and powers to evict boat owners from their privately owned pleasure craft, then to seize the vessel, remove it from whatever C&RT controlled waterway it happens to be on, and then finally to transport it away for disposal by means of either selling it on, illegally, to a new unsuspecting owner, or breaking it up, . . a regrettable state of affairs for which the responsibility rests wholly with the Community Law Partnership - the relatively useless and rather thick lawyers who advise and act for the NBTA and its members. The C&RT management, and its corrupt dishonest lawyers, regard themselves and the organisation as being above the Law, . . and exempt from the standards of honesty and common decency by which most of the UK population live.
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Mar 25, 2023 8:50:55 GMT
Worthless inconsequential nobody please. Regular or decaff?
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Mar 25, 2023 8:52:28 GMT
Tony's interpretation of the Law seems to be "If a boat is unlicensed, has no BSS or is in any other way non-compliant then there is no course of action available to enforce the legal requirements and CRT must simply walk away and leave the boater to it" and it seems vanishingly unlikely that any judge in any court would agree with this interpretation.
|
|
|
Post by Aloysius on Mar 25, 2023 8:54:13 GMT
I think the thing with the pedal powered boat is a bit odd. She takes the power plant out of her boat, and then claims she cannot meet the minimum cruising recommendation which you would presume she could more easily with diesel power. This is also coupled with her saying there are no downsides to pedal power before binning it into the bank at a water point with the slightest breeze. George is a bit of a minor player in the doc, and sadly seems to have mentally declined somewhat since filming however I don't have anywhere near enough letters after my name to have that be anything more than speculation. The real significance of that video is the way it illustrates the extent to which C&RT has fooled almost everyone, including the Courts, into believing that it has the lawful authority and powers to evict boat owners from their privately owned pleasure craft, then to seize the vessel, remove it from whatever C&RT controlled waterway it happens to be on, and then finally to transport it away for disposal by means of either selling it on, illegally, to a new unsuspecting owner, or breaking it up, . . a regrettable state of affairs for which the responsibility rests wholly with the Community Law Partnership - the relatively useless and rather thick lawyers who advise and act for the NBTA and its members. The C&RT management, and its corrupt dishonest lawyers, regard themselves and the organisation as being above the Law, . . and exempt from the standards of honesty and common decency by which most of the UK population live. You had the option to stay on board as they towed it away. Well, your dog did anyway.
|
|
|
Post by on Mar 25, 2023 8:57:31 GMT
Tony's interpretation of the Law seems to be "If a boat is unlicensed, has no BSS or is in any other way non-compliant then there is no course of action available to enforce the legal requirements and CRT must simply walk away and leave the boater to it" and it seems vanishingly unlikely that any judge in any court would agree with this interpretation. The judges have all had the wool pulled over their eyes and have NOT read the relevant legislation. Surely you can see that? They can't on account of the wool.
|
|
|
Post by on Mar 25, 2023 8:58:17 GMT
Worthless inconsequential nobody please. Regular or decaff? High calorie with extra sugar.
|
|
|
Post by on Mar 25, 2023 8:59:29 GMT
To make it easier en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statutory_interpretation"Sometimes the words of a statute have a plain and a straightforward meaning. But in many cases, there is some ambiguity in the words of the statute that must be resolved by the judge. To find the meanings of statutes, judges use various tools and methods of statutory interpretation, including traditional canons of statutory interpretation, legislative history, and purpose. " purpose /ˈpəːpəs/ noun 1. the reason for which something is done or created or for which something exists.
|
|