|
Post by Andyberg on May 12, 2024 7:38:24 GMT
Just watched these two geriatric JSO mongtards failing miserably in trying to get at / destroy the Magna Carta.π Im sorry, but damaging nationally important items - regardless of their cause - is not OK.π‘ Its just hypocrisy of the highest order, their generation have benefited most from the use of oil / gas / fossil fuels, I very much doubt they walked to the British Library in London either, talk about βIm alright Jack, pull the ladder upβ ! π Stick to knitting & baking or spreading your religious bile / abuse you pair of old numb-nuts. news.sky.com/story/just-stop-oil-protesters-in-their-80s-target-magna-carta-13132732Whats your thoughts on these peoples actions?
|
|
|
Post by kris on May 12, 2024 7:54:32 GMT
Itβs The British library.
|
|
|
Post by Clinton Cool on May 12, 2024 8:22:34 GMT
The British contribution to emissions is less than 1%. A rounding difference in finance terms or in other words, insignificant.
The old dears should book flights to China, India, Indonesia or Brazil, if they really want to make a difference.
|
|
|
Post by kris on May 12, 2024 8:28:41 GMT
The British contribution to emissions is less than 1%. A rounding difference in finance terms or in other words, insignificant. The old dears should book flights to China, India, Indonesia or Brazil, if they really want to make a difference. Depends when you start counting from. It could be said we caused it all by starting the industrial revolution.
|
|
|
Post by Trina on May 12, 2024 8:48:24 GMT
The vicar woman should be defrocked...but I suspect it would not be a pretty sight !
|
|
|
Post by Clinton Cool on May 12, 2024 11:18:23 GMT
The British contribution to emissions is less than 1%. A rounding difference in finance terms or in other words, insignificant. The old dears should book flights to China, India, Indonesia or Brazil, if they really want to make a difference. Depends when you start counting from. It could be said we caused it all by starting the industrial revolution. There's no point crying over spilt milk.
|
|
|
Post by kris on May 12, 2024 13:16:22 GMT
Depends when you start counting from. It could be said we caused it all by starting the industrial revolution. There's no point crying over spilt milk. Itβs not crying about spilt milk, itβs about accurate data. Your statement that the uk is only responsible for less than 1% of carbon released into the atmosphere, is only correct from a certain perspective. I was merely pointing this out to you.
|
|
|
Post by deleted on May 12, 2024 13:21:24 GMT
I very much doubt they walked to the British Library Yeah and I bet they vote Labour and own things as well
|
|
|
Post by β on May 12, 2024 13:38:25 GMT
Depends when you start counting from. It could be said we caused it all by starting the industrial revolution. There's no point crying over spilt milk. Indeed. Without a decent time machine it is very awkward to alter the outcomes of past events. The present is the only time which exists.
|
|
|
Post by Clinton Cool on May 12, 2024 13:49:21 GMT
There's no point crying over spilt milk. Itβs not crying about spilt milk, itβs about accurate data. Your statement that the uk is only responsible for less than 1% of carbon released into the atmosphere, is only correct from a certain perspective. I was merely pointing this out to you. The old dears were trying to change behaviour in the present and the future, not in the past.
|
|
|
Post by β on May 12, 2024 13:52:57 GMT
It is not possible to alter behaviour in the future. If the behaviour alters then that, along with everything else which ever happens, will be in the present.
The present is an immeasurably short time period where things neither get better nor worse. Its just that which is.
Nothing can be done about this basic fact other than to accept it.
Do yeah. Alter behaviours in the present.
Trying to do the past or future is a waste of time.
|
|
|
Post by deleted on May 12, 2024 13:54:23 GMT
Says the guy who spends most of the time living in the past
|
|
|
Post by kris on May 12, 2024 13:57:01 GMT
Itβs not crying about spilt milk, itβs about accurate data. Your statement that the uk is only responsible for less than 1% of carbon released into the atmosphere, is only correct from a certain perspective. I was merely pointing this out to you. The old dears were trying to change behaviour in the present and the future, not in the past.Β Β Your the one claiming the uk is responsible for less than 1% of carbon emissions. If youβd qualified it, it might have been correct. But you didnβt so it was meaningless. I just pointed this out. No comment about the two women, just your statement.
|
|
|
Post by deleted on May 12, 2024 14:01:31 GMT
In any case it's entirely appropriate that more developed economies lead the way on emerging tech.
|
|
|
Post by kris on May 12, 2024 14:14:34 GMT
In any case it's entirely appropriate that more developed economies lead the way on emerging tech. Just donβt let but bill gates shade the atmosphere to block the suns rays. I mean what could possibly go wrong?
|
|