|
Post by Andyberg on Jun 19, 2024 20:09:16 GMT
Heres one of the perpetratorsβ¦Presume his Pronouns are βcunt & twatβ ! π Parents / grandparents must be so proud.π€·π»ββοΈ
|
|
|
Post by β on Jun 19, 2024 20:31:24 GMT
Heres one of the perpetratorsβ¦Presume his Pronouns are βcunt & twatβ ! π Parents / grandparents must be so proud.π€·π»ββοΈ Licences not licenses! The latter would be a verb.
|
|
|
Post by β on Jun 19, 2024 20:33:58 GMT
Its sad in a way that the latest persons to be looked at were apparently 21 and 73. Easily influenced I suppose. 21 yar old bird whose parents presumably did not explain the rules of life and a 73 yar old geyser who probably has MCI.
And the cunts organising it probably get away with it.
I am not a druid or anything but fucking with stone henge is rude.
|
|
|
Post by β on Jun 19, 2024 20:36:13 GMT
Stone Henge is a magnificent and very important structure
|
|
|
Post by Andyberg on Jun 19, 2024 20:37:12 GMT
JSOβ¦ Tough on Druids. Tough on the relics of Druids. π
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Jun 19, 2024 20:42:52 GMT
I am not a druid or anything but fucking with stone henge is rude. That bloke off Coronation Street was a druid. When I was at Stonehenge at sunrise on Midsummer's Day, 1983, we were all tripping off our nuts and shouting things like "All right Ken? How's Deirdre?" and "Going down the Rovers tonight Ken?" which sort of spoiled the majesty of the occasion for him.
|
|
|
Post by β on Jun 19, 2024 20:43:19 GMT
Also the 'paint' they used was very corny. An oil based paint would have been more effective I suspect.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Stabby on Jun 19, 2024 21:02:32 GMT
Also the 'paint' they used was very corny. An oil based paint would have been more effective I suspect. Their aim was to generate publicity rather than damage Stonehenge.
|
|
|
Post by β on Jun 19, 2024 21:11:15 GMT
It worked. We are discussing it on here and as a former member was keen to point out there are a very large number of non contributing readers.
The influence knows no bounds.
|
|
|
Post by dogless on Jun 20, 2024 7:09:22 GMT
You have to wonder how they got to Stonehenge ?
Rog
|
|
|
Post by β on Jun 20, 2024 7:47:44 GMT
Donkeys.
They won't be using cars because tyres are made from crude oil derivatives as are the plastics used in the fittings.
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Jun 20, 2024 13:03:59 GMT
Stone Henge is a magnificent and very important structure However will it exist if there is no-one to look at it. I'd suggest there are morerer importanterer things to deal with. A few old petrol heads will grumble, it keeps them happy. Just paid the deposit on 10, 4.5k solar panels and 9kwh batteries for the bungalow, we joined a group buying scheme about 6 weeks ago, 20% cheaper.
|
|
|
Post by deleted on Jun 20, 2024 13:10:39 GMT
You have to wonder how they got to Stonehenge ? Rog Also I find the notion that any pro-environment action cannot use any form of means created through use of petro-chemicals to be as bullshit as the other mode nonsense that a socialist cannot turn a coin. take cover
|
|
|
Post by dogless on Jun 20, 2024 13:46:00 GMT
You have to wonder how they got to Stonehenge ? Rog Also I find the notion that any pro-environment action cannot use any form of means created through use of petro-chemicals to be as bullshit as the other mode nonsense that a socialist cannot turn a coin. take cover Humour ... a definition can be quoted if required. I find their unnecessary journey by public transport or other more personal transport, as humorously ironic as Emma Thompson or Greta Thunburg flying to join JSO protests. And wouldn't it be more focused and logical to attack refineries or distribution depots ? Rog ETA A Socialist being a buy-to-let landlord is the oxymoron , not turning a coin π
|
|
|
Post by deleted on Jun 20, 2024 14:11:42 GMT
Also I find the notion that any pro-environment action cannot use any form of means created through use of petro-chemicals to be as bullshit as the other mode nonsense that a socialist cannot turn a coin. take cover Humour ... a definition can be quoted if required. I find their unnecessary journey by public transport or other more personal transport, as humorously ironic as Emma Thompson or Greta Thunburg flying to join JSO protests. And wouldn't it be more focused and logical to attack refineries or distribution depots ? Rog ETA A Socialist being a buy-to-let landlord is the oxymoron , not turning a coin π Realistically, what alternative mode of transport is thereat this point? If something entirely battery-powered was used then the naye-sayers would still find plenty of scope for knee-jerk derision. Even a bicycle uses rubber tyres. The point is to focus attention on finding alternatives; there was a prototype car wheel sans tyres idea floated a while ago but like anything else in this world it won't be taken seriously until it starts to look like the cheaper option. And yes refineries and so on, but this would only grab headlines if it was a mass protest similar to the Aldermaston march. As has been noted, publicity is important; publicity is the point. And what actual damage has occurred to Stonehenge (or indeed any famous paintings)? Not a lot. But it is something to moan about so that's good.
|
|